Cited by 1,114Education during COVID-19 pandemicICT Impact and PoliciesEducational Innovations and Technology

COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies

Open access
Beaunoyer, Elisabeth, Dupéré, Sophie, Guitton, Matthieu J.·2020·Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract

With more than three billion people in isolation, the status of digital spaces is switching from an amenity to a necessity, as they become not only the main way to access information and services, but also one of the only remaining vectors for economic, educational, and leisure activities as well as for social interactions to take place. However, not all are equals in terms of access to networks or connected devices, or when it comes to the skills required to navigate computerized spaces optimally. Digital inequalities were already existing, yet the COVID-19 crisis is exacerbating them dramatically. On the one hand, the crisis will worsen digital inequalities within the population. On the other hand, digital inequalities represent a major risk factor of vulnerability for exposure to the virus itself, and for the non-sanitary consequences of the crisis. Therefore, this paper aims at exploring the reciprocal impacts of the COVID-19 crisis and digital inequalities, and to propose operative solutions to help fight the nefarious consequences of the crisis. We first describe how digital inequalities are a determinant of health. We then investigate how COVID-19 can potentiate digital inequalities, and how digital inequalities potentiate vulnerability to COVID-19. Finally, in order to contribute to the mitigation of this crisis, we propose a set of multi-layered strategies focusing on actionability that can be implemented at multiple structural levels, ranging from governmental to corporate and community levels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ramifications of the digital divide were amplified during the COVID-19 pandemic, as youth with limited access to digital devices and high-speed broadband were further disenfranchised when schooling went online.

    “The ramifications of the digital divide were amplified during the COVID-19 pandemic, as youth with limited access to digital devices and high-speed broadband were further disenfranchised when schooling went online (Beaunoyer et al., 2020).”

    From Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory. (2023) · cites this paper as Beaunoyer et al., 2020

    In “How COVID-19 potentiates digital inequalities” (page unavailable), the paper says the pandemic worsened disparities in access to devices and fast Internet connections, including for learning. It also calls digital access essential to education during COVID-19, but does not specifically say that youth were further disenfranchised when schooling moved online. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Health information about COVID prevention, testing, and vaccines was primarily transmitted through digital media, making lower socioeconomic and rural youth more vulnerable to the virus.

    “In addition to social isolation, health information about COVID prevention, testing, and vaccines was primarily transmitted through digital media, making lower socioeconomic and rural youth more vulnerable to the virus itself (Beaunoyer et al., 2020).”

    From Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological Theory. (2023) · cites this paper as Beaunoyer et al., 2020

    In “Vulnerability to the virus itself” (page unavailable), the paper says official agencies mainly used digital spaces to communicate protective measures and that rural residents can be difficult to reach, increasing vulnerability to infection. It does not establish that information about testing or vaccines was mainly delivered digitally, or specifically identify lower-socioeconomic and rural youth as the affected group. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The COVID-19 pandemic has increased digital inequalities further.

    “The COVID-19 pandemic has increased digital inequalities further”

    From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Beaunoyer, Dupéré, and Guitton 2020

    The section “How COVID-19 potentiates digital inequalities” says COVID-19 is “bound to deepen existing digital inequalities” and that digital exclusion is “likely to get exacerbated.” This supports the direction of the claim, but the paper frames the increase as an expectation rather than an established outcome, whereas “has increased” states it as fact. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Limited access to technology and internet has affected the normal development of teaching and learning practices.

    “These have not only affected the normal development of teaching and learning practices”

    From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Beaunoyer, Dupéré, and Guitton 2020

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed an additional impact in terms of social support networks that are crucial for the preservation of interpersonal ties and social structures.

    “has revealed an additional impact in terms of social support networks that are so crucial for the preservation of our interpersonal ties and social structures (Beaunoyer, Dupéré, and Guitton 2020).”

    From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Beaunoyer, Dupéré, and Guitton 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beaunoyer, E., Dupéré, S., & Guitton, M. J.
Affiliations
Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Guitton, Matthieu J.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
111
Pages
106424
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3024530634
Cited by
1,114
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 220 · 2022: 251 · 2021: 243 · 2020: 83
FWCI
302.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vanier Canada Graduate
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, digital inequality, digital divide, health disparities, COVID-19 vulnerability, internet access, digital skills, mitigation measures, social isolation, remote work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review