The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaborative Planning in Perspective
Open accessAbstract
This article presents a personal review by the author of Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, published in 1997. It explains how the book came to be written and makes some comments on the various criticisms it has attracted. The first section introduces key experiences that fed into the book followed by a brief summary of the key ideas that underpin its arguments. In reviewing the critiques, the article focuses in particular on the treatment of `context', the emphasis on `process', the use of `social theory', and `power', and the development of `institutionalist' analysis. This is followed by a comment on the normative biases in the work. In conclusion, the author makes a plea for continuing attention to the complexity and diversity of urban governance contexts and the importance for practical action of grasping the particularities of situated governance dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
(2014) · The Reflective Practitioner in Professional Education · doi:10.1057/9781137399595.0007 · Cited by 8,325
Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x · Cited by 6,796
Lukes, S. (2005) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,653
The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process
Hajer, M. A. (1997) · doi:10.1093/019829333x.001.0001 · Cited by 4,184
Harvey, D. (2009) · University of Georgia Press eBooks · doi:10.1353/book13205 · Cited by 3,069
Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies
Healey, P. (2006) · doi:10.25405/ncl.34571748.v1 · Cited by 2,484
Self-citationThe Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning
(1993) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822381815 · Cited by 1,992
Carey, G. W., & Harvey, D. (1975) · Geographical Review · doi:10.2307/213551 · Cited by 1,941
Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism
Peters, G. B. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,860
Cited by
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032 · Cited by 8,256
Ellis, G., Barry, J., & Robinson, C. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640560701402075 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Healey, P.
- Venue
- Planning Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101-123
- ISSN
- 1473-0952 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3052
- OpenAlex
- W2099436484
- Cited by
- 990
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 44.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collaborative Planning in Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/14730952030022002
- The paper
- Healey, P. (2003). Collaborative Planning in Perspective. Planning Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952030022002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.