Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge Within Planning Theory

Open access
Rydin, Yvonne·2007·Planning Theory
DOI 10.1177/1473095207075161
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

While modernist planning theory reifies knowledge as an object and makes it an inherent part of modernism's legitimacy, postmodern planning theory celebrates multiple epistemologies but fails to specify institutional arrangements for handling multiple knowledges in a way that recognizes the specificity of knowledge claims. An argument is made here for the limited variety of forms that such knowledge claims can take and the need to create spaces within planning processes for testing and recognizing these different knowledge claims.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1473095207075161

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Rydin, Y.
Venue
Planning Theory
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2007-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
52-68
ISSN
  • 1473-0952 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3052
DOI
10.1177/1473095207075161
OpenAlex
W2151025788
Cited by
340
References
35
FWCI
32.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge Within Planning Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1473095207075161
The paper
Rydin, Y. (2007). Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge Within Planning Theory. Planning Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207075161

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.