Cited by 10Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisMentoring and Academic DevelopmentCrime Patterns and Interventions

Evolution of Mentoring Relationships Involving Young Male Offenders Transitioning from a Juvenile Justice Centre to the Community

Hanham, José, Tracey, Danielle·2017·Youth Justice

Abstract

This qualitative longitudinal study focused on adolescent males who were being formally mentored during their transition from a juvenile justice centre to the community. Pre-release, the young men feared being exposed to negative peer influences and uncertainty about the future. In response to this anxiety, the young men valued the mentor as a guide, confidant and “watchdog”. Post-release, the concerns of the young men turned to a sense of disconnection, institutionalisation and difficulties securing employment. Here, the young men required their mentors to be reliable, build confidence and assist with educational and occupational opportunities. The findings both inform our theoretical understanding of mentoring and provide direction for supporting young offenders in the transition back into the community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1473225417699169

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The emotional component is the most frequently engaged and includes aspects of trust, reliability, consistency, support, and authenticity in mentoring programs in all formats operating with American, European, Israeli, and Australian youth.

    “The emotional component, which is the most frequently engaged, includes aspects of trust, reliability, consistency, support, and authenticity in mentoring programs in all formats operating with American, European, Israeli, and Australian youth [78,80,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96].”
  • The promoting-catalyzing component encourages self-esteem, autonomy and self-direction, role modeling, guidance, advocacy, empowerment and challenge, future planning, and promoting motivation, and includes skill-based career and academic support.

    “The third component of promoting-catalyzing encourages self-esteem, autonomy and self-direction, role modeling, guidance, advocacy, empowerment and challenge, future planning, and promoting motivation. Other elements of this component include skill-based career and academic support [80,82,83,85,86,88,92,93,98,108].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanham, J., & Tracey, D.
Corresponding author
Hanham, José
Venue
Youth Justice
Published
2017-03-22
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
116-133
ISSN
  • 1473-2254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-6283
OpenAlex
W2598187620
Cited by
10
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Youth Justice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
mentoring, young male offenders, juvenile justice, transition to community, peer influence, institutionalization, employment problems, educational opportunities, mentoring relationships, youth reentry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review