Cited by 11Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Welfare and AdoptionFamily Dynamics and Relationships

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mothering during domestic abuse: Protective agency as a force for change

Open access
Buchanan, Fiona, Moulding, Nicole T·2021·Qualitative Social Work

Abstract

Background: If women’s use of agency to protect their children from domestic abuse is considered at all, it is usually in terms of women staying or leaving abusive partners. Elsewhere women’s mothering, when they are enduring domestic abuse, is viewed from a perspective that focuses on finding deficits by observation and categorising the relationship between them and their children. Objective: The study, which informs this article, looked to the lived experiences of women who had mothered while enduring domestic abuse to better understand their thoughts, feelings and actions during that time. Participants and methods: The qualitative study considers the lived experience of 16 women, residing in South Australia, who raised young children while enduring domestic abuse. Semi-structured interviews followed by focus groups, which utilised creative methodologies were employed to collect data. Results: The study casts light on myriad ways that women exercise agency to protect their children. When lived experiences inform our understanding, it becomes clear that many women enduring domestic abuse exercise their agency to protect their children. Conclusion: We posit that, if agency is not a focus of enquiry it is overlooked by social workers focusing on deficits when considering mothering in domestic abuse. Too often, women are perceived solely as passive victims, unable or unwilling to protect vulnerable children. Yet important strategies to enable empowerment of both women and children are uncovered if social workers acknowledge and work with women and children to focus on the ways women exercise agency to protect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1473325020917743

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Ainsworth MDS, 1978, Patterns of Attachment
  2. 10.1177/104973230001000308 · DOI
  3. Buchanan F, 2018, Mothering Babies in Domestic Violence: Beyond Attachment Theory
  4. Buchanan F, 2020, Intersections of Mothering: Feminist Accounts
  5. 10.1177/1473325017694081 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/1077801210370311 · DOI
  7. 10.1086/424543 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s10896-008-9167-6 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/imhj.20253 · DOI
  10. 10.1300/J135v03n03_06 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/bjc/azh026 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/1077801210365887 · DOI
  13. 10.4324/9780203406373 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0893-3200.13.4.475 · DOI
  15. Habermas J, 1986, Autonomy and Solidarity
  16. Hesse-Biber SN, 2011, Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis
  17. 10.1177/0886109917706935 · DOI
  18. Humphreys C, Mullender, Thiara R and Skamballis A (2006) “Talking to my mum”: Developing communication between mothers and children in the aftermath of domestic violence. Journal of Social Work 6: 53–63. · DOI
  19. 10.1177/1077801210366288 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/1077800408326849 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00563.x · DOI
  22. 10.1002/9780470684771.ch5 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/a0024561 · DOI
  24. 10.1023/A:1011111003373 · DOI
  25. 10.1037/0893-3200.17.3.275 · DOI
  26. 10.1097/01.chi.0000181047.59702.58 · DOI
  27. Lincoln YS, 2003, Turning Points in Qualitative Research: Tying Knots in a Handkerchief
  28. 10.1177/14647001030042003 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/1077801210366455 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/14616730252982491 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/0886109909337374 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.4324/9780203410547 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/1368431006065719 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/1077801211404676 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s00737-005-0079-7 · DOI
  36. Radford L, 2006, Mothering through Domestic Violence
  37. Rich A, 1976, The American Poetry Review, 5, 6
  38. 10.1007/978-0-230-20901-5 · DOI
  39. 10.1177/1077801212475335 · DOI
  40. 10.1177/1077800406295622 · DOI
  41. 10.1057/ajp.2008.37 · DOI
  42. 10.2307/3341662 · DOI
  43. 10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015545.82803.90 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1177/0886109911428208 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Buchanan, F., & Moulding, N. T.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Buchanan, Fiona
Venue
Qualitative Social Work
Published
2020-04-11
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
665-680
ISSN
  • 1473-3250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3117
OpenAlex
W3015205956
Cited by
11
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Qualitative Social Work (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
domestic violence, maternal care, women's agency, child protection, lived experience, social work practice, deficit perspectives, empowerment, creative methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review