Cited by 83Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsFamily and Matrimonial Law

“If I Killed You, I'd Get the Kids”: Women's Survival and Protection Work with Child Custody and Access in the Context of Woman Abuse

Varcoe, Colleen, Irwin, Lori G.·2004·Qualitative Sociology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:quas.0000015545.82803.90

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varcoe, C., & Irwin, L. G.
Affiliations
University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
Varcoe, Colleen
Venue
Qualitative Sociology
Published
2004-03
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
77-99
ISSN
  • 0162-0436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7837
OpenAlex
W2043725376
Cited by
83
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Qualitative Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Law › Family and Matrimonial Law
Keywords
intimate partner violence, domestic violence, child custody, child visitation rights, women's survival strategies, gender-based violence, gender neutrality, women's employment, father-child relationship, gender analysis, child protection, family law policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review