Cited by 0Migration, Health and TraumaSocial Work Education and PracticeMigration, Racism, and Human Rights

Are we listening? Insights from Australian social workers navigating discourse and practice tensions in refugee mental health

Open access
Sabounji Qummouh, Rosemary, Harris, Sera, Linnell, Sheridan, Slewa-Younan, Shameran·2026·Qualitative Social Work

Abstract

This article explores social work practitioners’ experiences when working with Syrian and other refugees during resettlement using an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) within a practitioner-researcher, action-oriented methodology and a deconstructive theoretical framework. This study gathered firsthand practice narratives and insights from seven social workers engaged in high-complexity-needs case management and therapeutic approaches with refugees in mental health service delivery, investigating the challenges and dominant systemic discourses that social work practitioners engage with when working cross-culturally. A finding from this study emphasised the importance of practitioners adopting a collectivist approach to understanding how refugees experience the resettlement process. The findings elaborate on the complexities social work practitioners face when working with refugees, deepening socially and culturally informed insights. This study provides an important and timely opportunity for practitioners and policymakers to better understand the challenges of navigating refugee mental health services. By considering the social worker participants’ experiences, we can enhance practices and policies to better meet the needs of refugees and promote responsive, critically informed practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14733250261446595

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Sabounji Qummouh, R., Harris, S., Linnell, S., & Slewa-Younan, S.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Venue
Qualitative Social Work
Published
2026-04-30
ISSN
  • 1473-3250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3117
OpenAlex
W7160336466
Cited by
0
References
5
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Qualitative Social Work (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Health › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
Keywords
refugee mental health, Syrian refugees, social work practice, resettlement, cross-cultural practice, treatment options, practitioner experiences, culturally informed practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review