Are we listening? Insights from Australian social workers navigating discourse and practice tensions in refugee mental health
Open accessAbstract
This article explores social work practitioners’ experiences when working with Syrian and other refugees during resettlement using an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) within a practitioner-researcher, action-oriented methodology and a deconstructive theoretical framework. This study gathered firsthand practice narratives and insights from seven social workers engaged in high-complexity-needs case management and therapeutic approaches with refugees in mental health service delivery, investigating the challenges and dominant systemic discourses that social work practitioners engage with when working cross-culturally. A finding from this study emphasised the importance of practitioners adopting a collectivist approach to understanding how refugees experience the resettlement process. The findings elaborate on the complexities social work practitioners face when working with refugees, deepening socially and culturally informed insights. This study provides an important and timely opportunity for practitioners and policymakers to better understand the challenges of navigating refugee mental health services. By considering the social worker participants’ experiences, we can enhance practices and policies to better meet the needs of refugees and promote responsive, critically informed practices.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2 · Cited by 9,184 · see citing works
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023) · International Journal of Transgender Health · doi:10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597 · Cited by 2,878 · see citing works
The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Research Approach
Alase, A. (2017) · International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies · doi:10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9 · Cited by 1,088 · see citing works
Blackmore, R., Boyle, J. A., Fazel, M., Ranasinha, S., Gray, K. M., Fitzgerald, G., Misso, M., & Gibson-Helm, M. (2020) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003337 · Cited by 949 · see citing works
Challenging perspectives: Reflexivity as a critical approach to qualitative social work research
Ide, Y., & Beddoe, L. (2024) · Qualitative Social Work · doi:10.1177/14733250231173522 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Sabounji Qummouh, R., Harris, S., Linnell, S., & Slewa-Younan, S.
- Affiliations
- Western Sydney University
- Western Sydney University (AU)
- Venue
- Qualitative Social Work
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2026-04-30
- ISSN
- 1473-3250 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3117
- OpenAlex
- W7160336466
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Qualitative Social Work (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Health › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
- Keywords
- refugee mental health, Syrian refugees, social work practice, resettlement, cross-cultural practice, treatment options, practitioner experiences, culturally informed practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review