The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research directions in data wrangling: Visualizations and transformations for usable and credible data
Open accessAbstract
In spite of advances in technologies for working with data, analysts still spend an inordinate amount of time diagnosing data quality issues and manipulating data into a usable form. This process of ‘data wrangling’ often constitutes the most tedious and time-consuming aspect of analysis. Though data cleaning and integration arelongstanding issues in the database community, relatively little research has explored how interactive visualization can advance the state of the art. In this article, we review the challenges and opportunities associated with addressing data quality issues. We argue that analysts might more effectively wrangle data through new interactive systems that integrate data verification, transformation, and visualization. We identify a number of outstanding research questions, including how appropriate visual encodings can facilitate apprehension of missing data, discrepant values, and uncertainty; how interactive visualizations might facilitate data transform specification; and how recorded provenance and social interaction might enable wider reuse, verification, and modification of data transformations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Norman, D. (2016) · Vahlen eBooks · doi:10.15358/9783800648108 · Cited by 6,374
A Survey of Outlier Detection Methodologies
Hodge, V., & Austin, J. (2004) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-004-4304-y · Cited by 3,596
A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching
Rahm, E., & Bernstein, P. A. (2001) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s007780100057 · Cited by 3,352
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-5559 · Cited by 2,342
Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics
Thomas, J. J., & Cook, K. A. (2005) · Cited by 1,770
Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows
Oinn, T., Addis, M., Ferris, J., Marvin, D., Senger, M., Greenwood, M., Carver, T., Glover, K., Pocock, M. R., Wipat, A., et al. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth361 · Cited by 1,602
Duplicate Record Detection: A Survey
Elmagarmid, A. K., Ipeirotis, P. G., & Verykios, V. S. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2007.250581 · Cited by 1,267
Learning Information Extraction Rules for Semi-Structured and Free Text
Soderland, S. (1999) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007562322031 · Cited by 934
Hellerstein, J. M., Haas, P. J., & Wang, H. J. (1997) · Proceedings - ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/253260.253291 · Cited by 902
Extracting structured data from Web pages
Arasu, A., & García-Molina, H. (2003) · Proceedings - ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/872757.872799 · Cited by 698
Cited by
A Survey of Traffic Data Visualization
Chen, W., Guo, F., & Wang, F.-Y. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2015.2436897 · Cited by 294
Heer, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2012) · Queue · doi:10.1145/2133416.2146416 · Cited by 269
Self-citationThe Role of Uncertainty, Awareness, and Trust in Visual Analytics
Sacha, D., Senaratne, H., Kwon, B. C., Ellis, G., & Keim, D. A. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2015.2467591 · Cited by 267
Using Trust as a Measure to Derive Data Quality in Data Shared IoT Deployments
Byabazaire, J., O'Hare, G., & Delaney, D. (2020) · 2020 29th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN) · doi:10.1109/icccn49398.2020.9209633 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Kandel, S., Heer, J., Plaisant, C., Kennedy, J., van Ham, F., Riche, N. H., Weaver, C., Lee, B., Brodbeck, D., & Buono, P.
- Venue
- Information Visualization
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-09-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 271-288
- ISSN
- 1473-8716 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-8724
- OpenAlex
- W2143677795
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 8.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research directions in data wrangling: Visualizations and transformations for usable and credible data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1473871611415994
- The paper
- Kandel, S., Heer, J., Plaisant, C., Kennedy, J., van Ham, F., Riche, N. H., Weaver, C., Lee, B., Brodbeck, D., & Buono, P. (2011). Research directions in data wrangling: Visualizations and transformations for usable and credible data. Information Visualization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871611415994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
