The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability
Abstract
The goal of this article is to detect structural damage in the presence of operational and environmental variations using vibration-based damage identification procedures. For this purpose, four machine learning algorithms are applied based on the auto-associative neural network, factor analysis, Mahalanobis distance, and singular value decomposition. A base-excited three-story frame structure was tested in laboratory environment to obtain time-series data from an array of accelerometers under several structural state conditions. Tests were performed with varying stiffness and mass conditions with the assumption that these sources of variability are representative of changing operational and environmental conditions. Damage is simulated through nonlinear effects introduced by a bumper mechanism that induces a repetitive, impact-type nonlinearity. This mechanism intends to simulate the cracks that open and close under dynamic loads or loose connections that rattle. The unique contribution of this study is a direct comparison of the four proposed machine learning algorithms that have been reported as reliable approaches to separate structural conditions with changes resulting from damage from changes caused by operational and environmental variations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O., Kiranyaz, S., Hussein, M., Gabbouj, M., & Inman, D. J. (2021) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107077 · Cited by 1,442
Emerging Artificial Intelligence Methods in Structural Engineering
Salehi, H., & Burgueño, R. (2018) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.084 · Cited by 1,068
Sun, L., Shang, Z., Xia, Y., Bhowmick, S., & Nagarajaiah, S. (2020) · Journal of Structural Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002535 · Cited by 731
Hou, R., & Xia, Y. (2021) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741 · Cited by 674
Malekloo, A., Ozer, E., AlHamaydeh, M., & Girolami, M. (2022) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/14759217211036880 · Cited by 607
Metadata
- Authors
- Figueiredo, E., Park, G., Farrar, C. R., Worden, K., & Figueiras, J.
- Venue
- Structural Health Monitoring
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-11-26
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 559-572
- ISSN
- 1475-9217 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3168
- OpenAlex
- W2150869884
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1475921710388971
- The paper
- Figueiredo, E., Park, G., Farrar, C. R., Worden, K., & Figueiras, J. (2011). Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability. Structural Health Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921710388971
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.