The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine learning paradigm for structural health monitoring
Abstract
Structural health diagnosis and prognosis is the goal of structural health monitoring. Vibration-based structural health monitoring methodology has been extensively investigated. However, the conventional vibration–based methods find it difficult to detect damages of actual structures because of a high incompleteness in the monitoring information (the number of sensors is much fewer with respect to the number of degrees of freedom of a structure), intense uncertainties in the structural conditions and monitoring systems, and coupled effects of damage and environmental actions on modal parameters. It is a truth that the performance and conditions of a structure must be embedded in the monitoring data (vehicles, wind, etc.; acceleration, displacement, cable force, strain, images, videos, etc.). Therefore, there is a need to develop completely novel structural health diagnosis and prognosis methodology based on the various monitoring data. Machine learning provides the advanced mathematical frameworks and algorithms that can help discover and model the performance and conditions of a structure through deep mining of monitoring data. Thus, machine learning takes an opportunity to establish novel machine learning paradigm for structural health diagnosis and prognosis theory termed the machine learning paradigm for structural health monitoring. This article sheds light on principles for machine learning paradigm for structural health monitoring with some examples and reviews the existing challenges and open questions in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(1993) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1993 · Cited by 17,667
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.50 · Cited by 13,001
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications
Hyvärinen, A., & Oja, E. (2000) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(00)00026-5 · Cited by 8,705
Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science
Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1 · Cited by 5,673
Computer vision: algorithms and applications
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-5140 · Cited by 3,911
Los Alamos National Lab., N. (. S., Doebling, S., USDOE, W., Farrar, C., Prime, M., & Shevitz, D. (1996) · doi:10.2172/249299 · Cited by 2,899 · cited 2×
“Doebling et al.(1) comprehensively reviewed vibration-based SHM.”
An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction
Juang, J.-N., & Pappa, R. S. (1985) · Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/3.20031 · Cited by 2,762
Cited by
Jia, J., & Li, Y. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23218824 · Cited by 182
“At the algorithm level, two papers target CNN [37,88], two artificial intelligence [89,90], and one proposes a new machine learning paradigm [91].”
BackgroundDensely connected convolutional networks for vibration based structural damage identification
Wang, R., Li, J., Chencho, An, S., Hao, H., Liu, W., & Li, L. (2021) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112871 · Cited by 62
Lei, X., Siringoringo, D. M., Sun, Z., & Fujino, Y. (2023) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/14759217221116637 · Cited by 45
Guo, S., Ding, H., Li, Y., Feng, H., Xiong, X., Su, Z., & Feng, W. (2022) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109508 · Cited by 43
Yue, Z., Ding, Y., Zhao, H., & Wang, Z. (2022) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.011 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Bao, Y., & Li, H.
- Venue
- Structural Health Monitoring
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-11-24
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1353-1372
- ISSN
- 1475-9217 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3168
- OpenAlex
- W3110031974
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 18.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning paradigm for structural health monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1475921720972416
- The paper
- Bao, Y., & Li, H. (2021). Machine learning paradigm for structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720972416
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
