The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management
Abstract
Stylized facts matter enormously in management inquiry because such inquiry ultimately deals with the real world. But management research places much less emphasis on empirical regularities than we should expect, and that is required, for scholarship that ultimately concerns itself with the real world. Imagine grounding the study of real organizations only in theory; we ought to be laughed out of the academy for that. Yet our journals appear to insist on theory testing. In a field that seeks to understand the real world, it makes little sense to always put theory before facts. We must understand at least the broad outlines of ‘what’ a phenomenon consists of before we try to explain ‘why’ it occurs. That is, we need research directed toward uncovering empirical regularities, otherwise known as ‘stylized facts’. Only then are we in a position to build theory that in turn can serve as the basis for more refined tests and extensions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 27,577
The journal of financial economics
Schwert, G. W. (1993) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(93)90012-z · Cited by 2,542
Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge
Argote, L. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5251-5 · Cited by 493
Was there too little entry during the Dot Com Era?☆
Goldfarb, B. D., Kirsch, D. A., & MILLER, D. (2007) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.03.009 · Cited by 116
Cited by
Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?
Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.1952 · Cited by 1,160
Structure! Agency! (And Other Quarrels): A Meta-Analysis Of Institutional Theories Of Organization
Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Lander, M. W. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.36461835 · Cited by 623
Generalizing from Research Findings: The Merits of Case Studies
Tsang, E. W. K. (2014) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12024 · Cited by 420
Corporate foresight: An emerging field with a rich tradition
Rohrbeck, R., Battistella, C., & Huizingh, E. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.002 · Cited by 357
Dey, P. K., Chowdhury, S., Abadie, A., Vann Yaroson, E., & Sarkar, S. (2024) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2023.2179859 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Helfat, C. E.
- Venue
- Strategic Organization
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-192
- ISSN
- 1476-1270 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-315X
- OpenAlex
- W2098275698
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1476127007077559
- The paper
- Helfat, C. E. (2007). Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management. Strategic Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127007077559
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.