Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management

Helfat, Constance E.·2007·Strategic Organization

Abstract

Stylized facts matter enormously in management inquiry because such inquiry ultimately deals with the real world. But management research places much less emphasis on empirical regularities than we should expect, and that is required, for scholarship that ultimately concerns itself with the real world. Imagine grounding the study of real organizations only in theory; we ought to be laughed out of the academy for that. Yet our journals appear to insist on theory testing. In a field that seeks to understand the real world, it makes little sense to always put theory before facts. We must understand at least the broad outlines of ‘what’ a phenomenon consists of before we try to explain ‘why’ it occurs. That is, we need research directed toward uncovering empirical regularities, otherwise known as ‘stylized facts’. Only then are we in a position to build theory that in turn can serve as the basis for more refined tests and extensions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1476127007077559

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Helfat, C. E.
Venue
Strategic Organization
Published
2007-05
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
185-192
ISSN
  • 1476-1270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-315X
OpenAlex
W2098275698
Cited by
256
References
4
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1476127007077559
The paper
Helfat, C. E. (2007). Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management. Strategic Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127007077559

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.