The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Business models: A challenging agenda
Open accessAbstract
Most research on business models lies in the literature on strategy and competitive advantage and focuses on their role as descriptors of actual phenomenon, often by reference to taxonomic categories. In this article, we explore how business models can be seen as a set of cognitive configurations that can be manipulable in the minds of managers (and academics). By proposing a typology of business models that emphasizes the connecting of traditional value chain descriptors with how customers are identified and satisfied, and how the firm monetizes its value, we explore how business model configurations can extend current work on cognitive categorization and open up new possibilities for organization research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research
Fiss, P. C. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 · Cited by 5,930
Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/154247603322493212 · Cited by 5,642
The business model: Recent developments and future research
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311406265 · Cited by 4,790
Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers
Chesbrough, H. (2010) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010 · Cited by 3,850
Cited by
Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0
Müller, J. M., Buliga, O., & Voigt, K.-I. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.019 · Cited by 1,262
Sustainable business model research and practice: Emerging field or passing fancy?
Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Dembek, K. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.093 · Cited by 368
Learning while (re)configuring: Business model innovation processes in established firms
Berends, H., Smits, A., Reymen, I., & Podoynitsyna, K. (2016) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127016632758 · Cited by 274
Bidmon, C. M., & Knab, S. F. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.198 · Cited by 260
Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives
De Giacomo, M. R., & Bleischwitz, R. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2576 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Baden-Fuller, C., & Mangematin, V.
- Venue
- Strategic Organization
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 418-427
- ISSN
- 1476-1270 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-315X
- OpenAlex
- W2148808133
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 96.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Business models: A challenging agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1476127013510112
- The paper
- Baden-Fuller, C., & Mangematin, V. (2013). Business models: A challenging agenda. Strategic Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013510112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
