Cited by 51Crime Patterns and InterventionsCrime, Deviance, and Social ControlBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Juvenile Delinquency and Gender Revisited: The Family and Power-Control Theory Reconceived

Open access
Hadjar, Andreas, Baier, Dirk, Boehnke, Klaus, Hagan, John·2007·European Journal of Criminology

Abstract

Cross-cultural evidence on the gender gap in delinquency is presented. Based on power-control theory (PCT), gender differences in aggressive behaviour are analysed. We assume that differences in labour force participation between father and mother lead to differences in parental control behaviour towards boys and girls, which in turn lead to different risk-taking preferences and eventually produce gender differences in aggressive behaviour. A revised PCT acknowledges that dominance ideologies also play a role in the genesis of gender differences in delinquency. This proposition is also tested. Analyses are based on data from 319 families (father, mother and two adolescent opposite-sex siblings) from West Berlin, East Berlin and Toronto. The findings support assumptions of PCT but differ substantially between the three cities. Evidence of the link between structural patriarchy and parental style – postulated in the original PCT – is found in East Berlin, whereas the West Berlin and Toronto results fit a modified version of PCT featuring gender-role attitudes (ideological patriarchy).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1477370807071729

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The behavior of young individuals can be attributed to the influence of both their parents and society.

    “The study conducted by Hadjar, Baier, Boehnke, and Hagan (2007) found that the behavior of young individuals can be attributed to the influence of both their parents and society.”

    From Examining the Relationship between Poverty and Juvenile Delinquency Trends in a Developing Country (2024) · cites this paper as Hadjar, Baier, Boehnke, and Hagan (2007)

    The indexed record for Hadjar et al. (2007) says “No full text” and provides bibliographic details, not the study’s findings (repository record, no page). Searches for parental and societal influences returned passages about other works, but no passage from the cited study that verifies the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Adorno, T. W., 1950, The authoritarian personality
  2. Akademie der pädagogischen Wissenschaften, 1989, Berufslaufbahnen, Lebenspläne und Wertorientierungen
  3. 10.1080/1068316042000221121 · DOI
  4. Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, 1995, The new role of women: Family formation in modern societies
  5. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01237.x · DOI
  6. Boehnke, K., 1993, Psychologia, 36, 61
  7. 10.2307/350548 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0011128789035001002 · DOI
  9. Cohen, A., 1955, Delinquent boys
  10. 10.1086/228750 · DOI
  11. 10.2307/1131945 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/001872675400700202 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/sf/75.1.177 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/978-3-322-80537-9 · DOI
  15. Hadjar, A., 2003, Theoriedefizite der Jugendforschung. Standortbestimmung und Perspektiven, 174
  16. 10.1093/bjc/azh039 · DOI
  17. 10.2307/589499 · DOI
  18. 10.1086/228206 · DOI
  19. 10.1086/228583 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01250.x · DOI
  21. Harkness, S., 2002, Handbook of parenting, Vol. 2: Biology and ecology of parenting, 253
  22. Headland, T. N., 1990, Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate
  23. 10.1177/0306624X00442004 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/978-0-306-48039-3 · DOI
  25. Henning, H. J., 1977, Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 8, 185
  26. Hirsch, F., 1977, Social limits to growth
  27. Hirschi, T., 1969, Causes of delinquency
  28. Hofstede, G., 2003, Culture's consequences. Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations
  29. Howard, M. M., 1995, German Politics and Society, 13, 49
  30. Hu, L., 1995, Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications, 76
  31. 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Jerusalem, M., 1984, Selbstbezogene Kognitionen in schulischen Bezugsgruppen
  33. Jöreskog, K. G., 1986, LISREL VI. Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods
  34. Junger-Tas, J., 2003, Delinquency in an international perspective. The International Self-Reported Delinquency Study (ISRD)
  35. 10.1177/1477370804044007 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/978-1-349-22193-6_15 · DOI
  37. LaNovara, P., 1993, Canadian social trends, 171
  38. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00504.x · DOI
  39. Oakley, A., 1974, The sociology of housework
  40. Oswald, H., 2000, Images of Germany, 121
  41. 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00058-X · DOI
  42. 10.1037/h0023157 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01118.x · DOI
  44. Rhodes, J. E., 1993, Adolescence, 28, 879
  45. Schaller, J., 1972, Psychological Reports, 2, 17
  46. Schwartz, K., 1994, Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, 19, 71
  47. 10.1023/A:1022855104236 · DOI
  48. 10.1086/229611 · DOI
  49. Treiman, D. J., 1977, Occupational prestige in comparative perspective
  50. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., 1997, Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research
  51. Walby, S., 1990, Theorizing patriarchy
  52. Ward, C., 2001, The psychology of culture shock
  53. Weber, M., 1920, The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hadjar, A., Baier, D., Boehnke, K., & Hagan, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony (DE)
  • Constructor University (DE)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
European Journal of Criminology
Published
2007-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
33-58
ISSN
  • 1477-3708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2609
OpenAlex
W2149969701
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Criminology (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
juvenile delinquency, gender differences, power-control theory, parental control, labor force participation, patriarchy, gender role attitudes, aggression, risk preferences, cross-cultural comparison, East Berlin, West Berlin, Toronto

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review