The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Juvenile adaptation to imprisonment: Feelings of safety, autonomy and well-being, and behaviour in prison
Abstract
Adaptation to imprisonment involves feelings of safety, autonomy, well-being, stress or misbehaviour among detained offenders. According to importation theory, characteristics such as previous experiences of imprisonment or psychiatric problems affect the adaptation of offenders to imprisonment; deprivation theory, in contrast, focuses on factors such as social interactions with peers or staff and fairness in procedures or in daily life encounters. In this study, adaptation to imprisonment and the relationship with importation and deprivation factors were investigated among 207 juvenile offenders incarcerated in Dutch juvenile correctional institutions. A cross -sectional multi-method design was used, including a survey, screening instruments, records and qualitative interviews. Controlling for importation characteristics, strong associations of adaptation to imprisonment were found with interactions with peers and staff, justice, daily activities and the number of juveniles in a group. The study provides valuable insight into the factors related to adaptation to imprisonment, which can help to improve safety in prison and, subsequently, could be useful in increasing the motivation of juveniles to participate in treatment programmes. The implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Experiencing safety has a positive relation with social interaction with youth in a residential institution.
“Furthermore, experiencing safety has a positive relation with social interaction with youth in a residential institution (Van der Laan & Eichelsheim, 2013).”
From Safety First! Residential Group Climate and Antisocial Behavior: A Multilevel Meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Van der Laan & Eichelsheim, 2013
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 105
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.1086/449208 · DOI
- Andrews DA, 1994, The Psychology of Criminal Conduct
- 10.1177/0306624X97413002 · DOI
- 10.1086/449298 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.469 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1473225410369290 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · DOI · Paper page
- DeLisi M, 2010, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55
- 10.1177/0093854807302002 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00613.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0093854805284406 · DOI
- 10.1086/449105 · DOI
- 10.1177/0093854897024004002 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1984.tb00304.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0306624X00444004 · DOI
- 10.1097/00004583-200105000-00013 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01210.x · DOI
- Harvey J, 2007, Young Men in Prison. Surviving and Adapting to Life Inside
- 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.11.002 · DOI
- 10.2307/799047 · DOI
- 10.1177/003288550208200303 · DOI
- Jorna AE, 2010, Jeugdsurvey 2010
- Kuckartz U, 2012, MAXqda: Qualitative Data Analysis
- 10.1086/449299 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780199271221.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1177/1477370811413807 · DOI
- Liefaard T, 2012, Persisters and Desisters in Crime from Adolescence into Adulthood, 159
- Maitland AS, 1996, Federal Probation, 60, 24
- 10.1081/ADA-100107660 · DOI
- 10.1177/0032885599079001006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10683160802089768 · DOI
- 10.2307/591622 · DOI
- Staatssecretaris van Justitie, 2008, TK vergaderjaar 2007–2008, 289
- 10.1177/0093854807312787 · DOI
- Sykes GM, 1958, The Society of Captives
- 10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00084-8 · DOI
- 10.1037/10494-000 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00615.x · DOI
- Van der Laan AM, 2011, Jeugdcriminaliteit in de periode 1996–2010
- 10.1016/j.avb.2005.06.001 · DOI
- Wartna BSJ, 2011, Recidiveberichten 2002–2008
- 10.1177/1462474506064701 · DOI
- 10.1177/0093854899026002005 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511489365 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4613-8757-2 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Laan, A., & Eichelsheim, V.
- Affiliations
- Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum (NL)
- Leiden University (NL)
- Venue
- European Journal of Criminology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-06-28
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 424-443
- ISSN
- 1477-3708 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2609
- OpenAlex
- W2324025662
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 15.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- juvenile offenders, importation theory, deprivation theory, sense of security, autonomy, well-being, group size, juvenile correctional institutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review