Wearing body cameras increases assaults against officers and does not reduce police use of force: Results from a global multi-site experiment
Open accessAbstract
Police use of force is at the forefront of public awareness in many countries. Body-worn videos (BWVs) have been proposed as a new way of reducing police use of force, as well as assaults against officers. To date, only a handful of peer-reviewed randomised trials have looked at the effectiveness of BWVs, primarily focusing on use of force and complaints. We sought to replicate these studies, adding assaults against police officers as an additional outcome. Using a prospective meta-analysis of multi-site, multi-national randomised controlled trials from 10 discrete tests with a total population of +2 million, and 2.2 million police officer-hours, we assess the effect of BWVs on the rates of (i) police use of force and (ii) assaults against officers. Averaged over 10 trials, BWVs had no effect on police use of force ( d = 0.021; SE = 0.056; 95% CI: –0.089–0.130), but led to an increased rate of assaults against officers wearing cameras (d = 0.176; SE = 0.058; 95% CI: 0.061–0.290). As there is evidence that cameras may increase the risk of assaults against officers, more attention should be paid to how these devices are implemented. Likewise, since other public-facing organisations are considering equipping their staff with BWVs (e.g. firefighters, private security, traffic wardens), the findings on risks associated with BWVs are transferrable to those occupations as well.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There were no differences between treatment and control conditions in terms of the distribution of shifts.
“with no differences between treatment and control conditions in terms of the distribution of shifts (Ariel et al. 2016).”
From Report: increases in police use of force in the presence of body-worn cameras are driven by officer discretion: a protocol-based subgroup analysis of ten randomized experiments (2016) · cites this paper as Ariel et al. 2016
The previous multisite randomized controlled trial found that police body-worn cameras had, on average, no effect on recorded incidents of police use of force.
“Our multisite randomized controlled trial reported that police body-worn cameras (BWCs) had, on average, no effect on recorded incidents of police use of force.”
From Report: increases in police use of force in the presence of body-worn cameras are driven by officer discretion: a protocol-based subgroup analysis of ten randomized experiments (2016) · cites this paper as Ariel et al. 2016
Cites
The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact.
Adair, J. G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.334 · Cited by 1,095 · see citing works
Ariel, B., Farrar, W. A., & Sutherland, A. (2015) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., Megicks, S., & Henderson, R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-016-9261-3 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
“We have previously reported results from a global multisite randomized controlled trial on the effect of BWCs on various outcomes, including use of force, complaints against the police, and assaults against officers (Ariel et al. 2016).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationLayers of bias: A unified approach for understanding problems with risk assessment
Eckhouse, L., Lum, K., Conti-Cook, C., & Ciccolini, J. (2019) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854818811379 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., Megicks, S., & Henderson, R. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-017-9311-5 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationAnti-racist actions and accountability: not more empty promises
Boykin, C. M., Brown, N. D., Carter, J. T., Dukes, K., Green, D. J., Harrison, T., Hebl, M., McCleary-Gaddy, A., Membere, A., McJunkins, C. A., et al. (2020) · Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/edi-06-2020-0158 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., & Sherman, L. W. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-018-9344-4 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., Megicks, S., & Henderson, R.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- RAND Europe (GB)
- West Midlands Police (GB)
- Ventura Police Department, USA
- West Yorkshire Police (GB)
- Cambridgeshire Constabulary, UK
- Police Service of Northern Ireland (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sutherland, Alex
- Venue
- European Journal of Criminology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-24
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 744-755
- ISSN
- 1477-3708 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2609
- OpenAlex
- W2403695017
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 146.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Apollo (cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Restraint-Related Deaths
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Keywords
- body-worn cameras, police use of force, police accountability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review