Cited by 216Policing Practices and PerceptionsRestraint-Related DeathsDeception detection and forensic psychology

Wearing body cameras increases assaults against officers and does not reduce police use of force: Results from a global multi-site experiment

Open access
Ariel, Barak, Sutherland, Alex, Henstock, Darren, Young, Josh, Drover, Paul, Sykes, Jayne, Megicks, Simon, Henderson, Ryan·2016·European Journal of Criminology

Abstract

Police use of force is at the forefront of public awareness in many countries. Body-worn videos (BWVs) have been proposed as a new way of reducing police use of force, as well as assaults against officers. To date, only a handful of peer-reviewed randomised trials have looked at the effectiveness of BWVs, primarily focusing on use of force and complaints. We sought to replicate these studies, adding assaults against police officers as an additional outcome. Using a prospective meta-analysis of multi-site, multi-national randomised controlled trials from 10 discrete tests with a total population of +2 million, and 2.2 million police officer-hours, we assess the effect of BWVs on the rates of (i) police use of force and (ii) assaults against officers. Averaged over 10 trials, BWVs had no effect on police use of force ( d = 0.021; SE = 0.056; 95% CI: –0.089–0.130), but led to an increased rate of assaults against officers wearing cameras (d = 0.176; SE = 0.058; 95% CI: 0.061–0.290). As there is evidence that cameras may increase the risk of assaults against officers, more attention should be paid to how these devices are implemented. Likewise, since other public-facing organisations are considering equipping their staff with BWVs (e.g. firefighters, private security, traffic wardens), the findings on risks associated with BWVs are transferrable to those occupations as well.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1477370816643734

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., Megicks, S., & Henderson, R.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • RAND Europe (GB)
  • West Midlands Police (GB)
  • Ventura Police Department, USA
  • West Yorkshire Police (GB)
  • Cambridgeshire Constabulary, UK
  • Police Service of Northern Ireland (GB)
Corresponding author
Sutherland, Alex
Venue
European Journal of Criminology
Published
2016-07-24
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
744-755
ISSN
  • 1477-3708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2609
OpenAlex
W2403695017
Cited by
216
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
146.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Criminology (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Apollo (cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Restraint-Related Deaths
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
body-worn cameras, police use of force, police accountability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review