Self-determination theory in schools of education: Can an empirically supported framework also be critical and liberating?
Abstract
In many graduate schools of education there is strong resistance to formal theories, especially those that are supported through quantitative empirical methods. In this article we describe how self-determination theory (SDT), a formal and empirically focused framework, shares sensibilities with critical theorists concerning the importance of actors' own embedded experiences of the world, and the importance of liberation and resistance to hegemony. Yet we argue that, unlike many post-modern views that are largely negative, SDT is truly critical precisely because it posits a common human nature, which can be more or less supported and allowed to flourish in different cultural and institutional contexts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The divergent findings may reflect the impact of pre-existing severe medical conditions on motivation and ability to exercise, alongside potential participation bias for physically healthier populations.
“These divergent findings may reflect the impact of pre-existing severe medical conditions on motivation and ability to exercise 139 140 , alongside potential participation bias for physically healthier populations 141 .”
From Effect of exercise on depression and anxiety symptoms: systematic umbrella review with meta-meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [140]
Cites
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210 · see citing works
Self-citationRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 27,815 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 · Cited by 6,037 · see citing works
Self-citationSulea, C., van Beek, I., Sarbescu, P., Virga, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.018 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ryan, R. M., & Niemiec, C. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ryan, Richard M.
- Venue
- Theory and Research in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-06-25
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 263-272
- ISSN
- 1477-8785 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3192
- OpenAlex
- W2116811604
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Theory and Research in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- self-determination theory, graduate school of education, critical theory, quantitative research, human nature, liberation, hegemony, postmodernism, institutional environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review