Cited by 96Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Philosophy, and SocietyEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Self-determination theory in schools of education: Can an empirically supported framework also be critical and liberating?

Ryan, Richard M., Niemiec, Christopher P.·2009·Theory and Research in Education

Abstract

In many graduate schools of education there is strong resistance to formal theories, especially those that are supported through quantitative empirical methods. In this article we describe how self-determination theory (SDT), a formal and empirically focused framework, shares sensibilities with critical theorists concerning the importance of actors' own embedded experiences of the world, and the importance of liberation and resistance to hegemony. Yet we argue that, unlike many post-modern views that are largely negative, SDT is truly critical precisely because it posits a common human nature, which can be more or less supported and allowed to flourish in different cultural and institutional contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1477878509104331

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The divergent findings may reflect the impact of pre-existing severe medical conditions on motivation and ability to exercise, alongside potential participation bias for physically healthier populations.

    “These divergent findings may reflect the impact of pre-existing severe medical conditions on motivation and ability to exercise 139 140 , alongside potential participation bias for physically healthier populations 141 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ryan, R. M., & Niemiec, C. P.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Ryan, Richard M.
Venue
Theory and Research in Education
Published
2009-06-25
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
263-272
ISSN
  • 1477-8785 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3192
OpenAlex
W2116811604
Cited by
96
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Theory and Research in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
self-determination theory, graduate school of education, critical theory, quantitative research, human nature, liberation, hegemony, postmodernism, institutional environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review