The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Holton's Evaluation Model: New Evidence and Construct Elaborations
Abstract
The problem and the solution. Holton proposed the HRD Evaluation and Research Model as a comprehensive framework for diagnosing and understanding the causal influences of HRD intervention outcomes. Unfortunately, a full test of Holton's model has not been possible because tools to measure the constructs in the model did not exist. This article reviews recent studies relevant to the constructs in Holton’s model and updates it by delineating specific constructs that should be measured in each of the conceptual categories proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678 · Cited by 2,126 · cited 6×
“However, Colquitt et al.’s (2000) meta-analysis did not find job involvement to be a significant predictor and they were unable to test organizational commitment due to an insufficient number of studies.”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement: A Review of the Locus of Control Construct
Kormanik, M. B., & Rocco, T. S. (2009) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484309342080 · Cited by 111
Gkioka, M., Schneider, J., Kruse, A., Tsolaki, M., Moraitou, D., & Teichmann, B. (2020) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-200741 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Holton, E. F.
- Venue
- Advances in Developing Human Resources
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-54
- ISSN
- 1523-4223 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3055
- OpenAlex
- W2053577954
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.