The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disclosure of Intimate Partner Violence to Informal Social Support Network Members: A Review of the Literature
Abstract
This article presents a review of the published literature to date on rates, experiences, and correlates of victims’ disclosure of or help seeking for intimate partner violence to informal social support network members (e.g., friends, family, classmates, and coworkers). Research indicates that the majority of individuals disclose to at least one informal support and that victims’ disclosure is associated with a number of demographic (e.g., victims’ sex, age, race), intrapersonal (e.g., victims’ feelings of shame/embarrassment, perception of control over abuse), and situational (e.g., violence frequency and severity, if abuse is witnessed) factors. Following disclosure, victims experience a wide range of positive (e.g., believing the victim’s reports, validating the victim’s experiences) and negative (e.g. disbelieving, blaming the victim) social reactions, with positive reactions rated as the most common and most helpful forms of support by victims. Finally, a review of psychological correlates associated with reactions to disclosure indicates that positive social reactions are associated with more psychological health benefits and fewer negative health symptoms, whereas negative social reactions were associated with increased negative psychological health symptoms. Future research methodologies and implications for violence prevention, intervention, and policy are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Over three quarters of women experiencing DVA disclose the abuse at some point, [4][5][6]”
From Help‐seeking amongst women survivors of domestic violence: a qualitative study of pathways towards formal and informal support (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Studies of help-seeking have mostly been conducted in North America, many limited to cross-sectional data from retrospective surveys, often using a priori response categories and no follow-up of respondents.5,23”
From Help‐seeking amongst women survivors of domestic violence: a qualitative study of pathways towards formal and informal support (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Women experiencing abuse tend to have small networks with weak interconnections, partly as a result of coercion from the abusive partner, giving limited opportunities for disclosure.5,9,10”
From Help‐seeking amongst women survivors of domestic violence: a qualitative study of pathways towards formal and informal support (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“The study provides corroboration and further understanding of barriers to disclosure and help-seeking previously identified.”
From Help‐seeking amongst women survivors of domestic violence: a qualitative study of pathways towards formal and informal support (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Previous studies suggest that women's disclosure of abuse and help-seeking represents empowered, planned and strategic actions, 2,5 but this study shows it is not always so.”
From Help‐seeking amongst women survivors of domestic violence: a qualitative study of pathways towards formal and informal support (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“however, the extent of disclosure differed with age, nature, ethnicity and gender [4].”
From A systematic review of intimate partner violence interventions focused on improving social support and/ mental health outcomes of survivors (2020) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Survivors of violence are likely to first disclose experiences of intimate partner violence and expect informal support from a friend, family member, neighbour or other members of their social network, prior to seeking support from formal sources like health institutions and legal officers”
From A systematic review of intimate partner violence interventions focused on improving social support and/ mental health outcomes of survivors (2020) · cites this paper as [4]
Citations
Cites
Mead, G. H., & Morris, C. W. (1967) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226516608.001.0001 · Cited by 4,915
Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist.
Morrow, G. R., Mead, G. H., & Morris, C. W. (1935) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2179928 · Cited by 2,153
The Transtheoretical Approach: Crossing Traditional Boundaries of Therapy
Sporakowski, M. J., Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1986) · Family Relations · doi:10.2307/584540 · Cited by 1,976
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/10778010022181769 · Cited by 1,145
Intimate Partner Violence and Physical Health Consequences
Campbell, J. C., Jones, A. S., Dienemann, J. A., Kub, J. E., Schollenberger, J., O'Campo, P. J., GIELEN, A. C., & Wynne, C. (2002) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.162.10.1157 · Cited by 1,060
Liang, B., Goodman, L., Tummala-Narra, P., & Weintraub, S. (2005) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-005-6233-6 · Cited by 808
Social Support Protects against the Negative Effects of Partner Violence on Mental Health
Coker, A. L., Smith, P. H., Thompson, M. P., McKeown, R. E., Bethea, L., & Davis, K. E. (2002) · Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine · doi:10.1089/15246090260137644 · Cited by 669
Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations
Straus, M. A. (2007) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.10.004 · Cited by 646
Intimate Partner Violence and Physical Health Consequences
Plichta, S. B. (2004) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260504269685 · Cited by 524
Intimate Partner Violence and Adverse Health Consequences: Implications for Clinicians
Black, M. C. (2011) · American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine · doi:10.1177/1559827611410265 · Cited by 500
Cited by
Sorted by citations
(2020) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 475
Kennedy, A. C., & Prock, K. A. (2018) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838016673601 · Cited by 471
Edwards, K. M., Sylaska, K., & Neal, A. M. (2015) · Psychology of Violence · doi:10.1037/a0038656 · Cited by 376
Self-citationCampus and College Victim Responses to Sexual Assault and Dating Violence
Sabina, C., & Ho, L. Y. (2014) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838014521322 · Cited by 360
Dworkin, E. R., Brill, C. D., & Ullman, S. E. (2019) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101750 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Sylaska, K. M., & Edwards, K. M.
- Affiliations
- University of New Hampshire (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sylaska, Kateryna M.
- Venue
- Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-07-24
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-21
- ISSN
- 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8324
- OpenAlex
- W2015651013
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11
- FWCI
- 21.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Keywords
- intimate partner violence, disclosure, informal support, help-seeking, victim reactions, shame and embarrassment, victim blaming, social validation, mental health outcomes, violence prevention
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Female, Helping Behavior, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Risk Factors, Self Disclosure, Sexual Partners, Social Support, Spouse Abuse, Crime Victims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review