Cited by 471Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and Trauma

“I Still Feel Like I Am Not Normal”: A Review of the Role of Stigma and Stigmatization Among Female Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse, Sexual Assault, and Intimate Partner Violence

Kennedy, Angie C., Prock, Kristen A.·2018·Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

Abstract

Child sexual abuse (CSA), sexual assault (SA), and intimate partner violence (IPV) occur within social contexts that shape how survivors judge themselves and are evaluated by others. Because these are gendered sexual and intimate crimes that violate social norms about what is appropriate and acceptable, survivors may experience stigma that includes victim-blaming messages from the broader society as well as specific stigmatizing reactions from others in response to disclosure; this stigmatization can be internalized among survivors as self-blame, shame, and anticipatory stigma. Stigma and stigmatization play an important role in shaping survivors' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors as they recover; their risk of revictimization; and their help-seeking and attainment process. In this review, we synthesize recent CSA, SA, and IPV research ( N = 123) that examines female survivors' self-blame, shame, internalized stigma, and anticipatory stigma as well as negative social reactions in response to survivors' disclosure. We highlight critical findings as well as implications for research, practice, and policy, and we note gaps in our current knowledge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1524838016673601

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stigma associated with sexual assault may contribute to inaccurate or unhelpful negative attributions or encourage avoidance of discussing the assault with others, uniquely obstructing PTSD recovery.

    “Stigma associated with sexual assault (e.g., victim blame; Kennedy & Prock, 2018; Lebowitz & Roth, 1994) may contribute to inaccurate or unhelpful negative attributions or encourage avoidance of discussing the assault with others (Kelley et al., 2009; see for exception Smith et al., 2016), uniquely obstructing PTSD recovery.”

    From PTSD in the Year Following Sexual Assault: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Kennedy & Prock, 2018

  • Survivors of sexual assault may be more likely to receive negative social reactions than survivors of non-stigmatized traumas.

    “when survivors disclose sexual assault to others, they may be more likely to receive negative social reactions than survivors of non-stigmatized traumas (Kennedy & Prock, 2018).”

    From PTSD in the Year Following Sexual Assault: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Kennedy & Prock, 2018

  • Societal stigma and negative social reactions may explain higher PTSD prevalence and severity after sexual assault versus other traumas.

    “Given prior research suggesting that societal stigma and negative social reactions may explain higher PTSD prevalence and severity after sexual assault versus other traumas (Dworkin et al., 2019; Kennedy & Prock, 2018)”

    From PTSD in the Year Following Sexual Assault: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Kennedy & Prock, 2018

  • Prosecutorial decision-making in sexual violence cases is influenced by the complainant's willingness to cooperate, whether the case is likely to result in a conviction, the complainant's perceived credibility, the presence of injuries, and whether the complainant and perpetrator were acquainted.

    “Prosecutorial decision-making has been found to be influenced by the complainant’s willingness to cooperate (Kennedy, 2018; Spohn & Tellis, 2019), whether the case is likely to result in a conviction (O’Neal et al., 2015), the complainant’s perceived credibility (Beichner & Spohn, 2005; Campbell et al., 2012), the presence of injuries (Alderden & Ullman, 2012; Fansher & Welsh, 2023; O’Neal et al.,”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kennedy, A. C., & Prock, K. A.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Angie C.
Venue
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Published
2016-11-01
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
512-527
ISSN
  • 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8324
OpenAlex
W2546378150
Cited by
471
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
stigma, stigmatization, women survivors, child sexual abuse, sexual assault, intimate partner violence, self-blame, shame, self-stigma, victim blaming, disclosure, revictimization, help-seeking, gender
MeSH terms
Help-Seeking Behavior, Intimate Partner Violence, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Rape, Shame, Stereotyping, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Crime Victims, Disclosure, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review