Childhood Emotional Maltreatment and Adulthood Romantic Relationship Well-Being: A Multilevel, Meta-Analytic Review
Abstract
During the past decade, research on the link between childhood emotional maltreatment and adulthood romantic relationship well-being has been accumulating, but there still lacks a systematic, quantitative evaluation of existing research. This three-level, meta-analysis aimed to fill this gap. Reports were included if they examined the link between early emotional maltreatment and adulthood romantic relationship well-being, presented statistics needed to calculate at least one bivariate effect size, written in English, and published/written before January 1, 2020. We retrieved 201 effect sizes from 23 reports. Early emotional maltreatment (aggregated across forms) was negatively (yet modestly) associated with later romantic relationship well-being (aggregated across dimensions; r = −.143, 95% confidence interval [−.173, −.114], p < .001). This association did not vary as a function of maltreatment form but differed across relationship well-being dimensions, such that the effect was stronger for the negative than for the positive relationship outcomes. We also found that (a) the actor effect was larger than the partner effect, (b) the effect was stronger in studies using Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) than in studies not using CTQ, (c) whether using established measures of relationship well-being did not alter the effect, (d) the absolute magnitude of effect was negatively associated with methodological rigor of effect, and (e) the effect did not vary as functions of publication type, whether the sample was a college student sample, or union status, and was not related to the mean of union duration. Last, the limitations of existing research, avenues for future inquiries, and implications for practice were noted.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
On the Use of Beta Coefficients in Meta-Analysis.
Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175 · Cited by 1,643 · see citing works
Cheung, M. W.-L. (2014) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0032968 · Cited by 1,342 · see citing works
Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial
Assink, M., & Wibbelink, C. J. M. (2016) · The Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.12.3.p154 · Cited by 1,330 · see citing works
Differential adult symptomatology associated with three types of child abuse histories
Briere, J., & Runtz, M. (1990) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/0145-2134(90)90007-g · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Resilience following child maltreatment: a review of protective factors
Afifi, T. O., & MacMillan, H. L. (2011) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371105600505 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Psychometric properties of the Early Trauma Inventory-Self Report
Bremner, J. D., Bolus, R., & Mayer, E. A. (2007) · Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000243824.84651.6c · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Fixed effects and variance components estimation in three-level meta-analysis
Konstantopoulos, S. (2011) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.35 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Riggs, S. A. (2010) · Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma · doi:10.1080/10926770903475968 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Marsh, H. W., Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Daniel, H.-D., & O’Mara, A. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654309334143 · Cited by 174 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A random-effect rather than a fixed-effect model was used based on the assumption that “variability between studies is assumed to reflect both sampling error and variability in the population of effects” (Marsh et al., 2009, p. 1295).”
MethodChildhood emotional abuse and attachment processes in the dyadic adjustment of dating couples.
Riggs, S. A., Cusimano, A. M., & Benson, K. M. (2011) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021319 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Maneta, E. K., Cohen, S., Schulz, M. S., & Waldinger, R. J. (2015) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.07.017 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Liu, S., Wang, Z., Lu, S., & Shi, J. (2019) · Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma · doi:10.1080/10926771.2018.1466381 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Partner Effects of Childhood Maltreatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Vaillancourt-Morel, M.-P., Bussières, È.-L., Nolin, M.-C., & Daspe, M.-È. (2024) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380231173427 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“However, for this effect size, Cao et al. (2020) combined only four studies, and merged different dimensions of relationship well-being (i.e., overall satisfaction, overall dysfunction, intimacy, conflicts, instability) which may explain their very large confidence interval.”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Cao, H., Ma, R., Li, X., Liang, Y., Wu, Q., Chi, P., Li, J.-B., & Zhou, N.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Normal University (CN)
- University of Arizona (US)
- University of Macau (MO)
- Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Nan
- Venue
- Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-12-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 778-794
- ISSN
- 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8324
- OpenAlex
- W3108548192
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700966)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Keywords
- childhood emotional abuse, intimate relationships, early childhood trauma, actor-partner effects, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, methodological quality
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review