Cited by 12Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Health Care Providers Views on Identifying and Responding to South Asian Women Experiencing Family Violence: A Qualitative Meta Synthesis

Baloch, Surriya, Hameed, Mohajer, Hegarty, Kelsey·2023·Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

Abstract

Family violence (FV) is a universal public health problem in South Asia with negative-health outcomes for South Asian women. Health care providers (HCPs) play a pivotal role in identifying and supporting women experiencing FV, but little is known about their experiences with South Asian women. A systematic review was conducted to explore and address health care providers’ views on identification and response to South Asian women experiencing FV. Nine online databases, reference lists were searched, and a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied independently by two reviewers. A meta-synthesis approach was utilized to integrate findings from qualitative studies. Eight studies involving 250 participants met the inclusion criteria. Studies were published between 2007 and 2020 within South Asian countries (Pakistan, India, and Sri Lanka) and one study from the USA and UK. The meta-synthesis identified three themes: Context of societal norms and attitudes towards women in South Asia; Influence of family honor, Privacy and shame; and Concern about health care provider’s personal safety. Findings revealed that FV is often perceived as a normal routine issue and is considered a “private issue” in South Asian society. Family honor and values play a pivotal role in silencing women experiencing FV as disclosure is considered shameful and disgrace to family honor. Furthermore, health care providers avoid intervening in FV cases due to risk for their personal safety. Finally, this review provides the evidence to support a specific framework for FV interventions among south Asian women for policy makers and practitioners.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/15248380211043829

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bhandari M., 2009, Intimate partner violence and the orthopaedic surgeon a call for action
  2. Covidence systematic review software, 2018, Covidence systematic review software
  3. Critical Appraisal Skills Program, 2018, Critical appraisal skills program (CASP) qualitative checklist
  4. Moher D., 2009, BMJ: British Medical Journal, 339, 332
  5. Noyes J., 2011, Supplementary guidance for inclusion of qualitative research in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions, 1
  6. Shaikh M. A., 2008, Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP, 18, 662
  7. Thomas J., 2008, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 1
  8. World Health Organization, 2013, Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women : WHO clinical and policy guidelines

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baloch, S., Hameed, M., & Hegarty, K.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Baloch, Surriya
Venue
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Published
2022-01-19
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
794-808
ISSN
  • 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8324
OpenAlex
W4205278027
Cited by
12
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
domestic violence, South Asian women, healthcare workers, family honor, social norms, provider safety, disclosure of abuse, violence against women, South Asia
MeSH terms
Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Pakistan, Domestic Violence, Qualitative Research, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review