Cited by 122Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsICT in Developing CommunitiesMobile Learning in Education

Use of Mobile Health (mHealth) Technologies and Interventions Among Community Health Workers Globally: A Scoping Review

Early, Jody, Gonzalez, Carmen, Gordon-Dseagu, Vanessa, Robles-Calderon, Laura·2019·Health Promotion Practice

Abstract

There is mounting evidence to show that community health workers (CHWs) play a positive role in improving population health by connecting people to information, resources, and services. However, barriers faced by CHWs include not being able to access information quickly and in a language tailored to the communities they serve. Mobile health (mHealth) shows promise of bridging this gap. Although there are a number of studies published on mHealth interventions, there is a need to synthesize the literature specific to mHealth and CHWs globally. Therefore, the primary goals of this review are to identify and describe over ten years of studies on the use, effectiveness, and potential of mHealth involving CHWs. Findings provide evidence-based strategies for designing and implementing mHealth tools for and with CHWs. We used criteria and methodology for scoping reviews established by the Joanna Briggs Institute as well as PRISMA protocols. We searched scholarly databases for peer-reviewed articles published between 2007 and 2018. The initial search yielded 207 published articles; after applying inclusion criteria, the sample totaled 64. While research about mHealth use among CHWs is still emerging, we found out that large-scale, longitudinal, and clinical studies are lacking. The existing evidence indicates that interventions, which include both CHWs and mHealth tools, are effective. Challenges include the scarcity of culturally relevant mHealth interventions, lack of a consistent methodology to assess mHealth outcomes, the need for effective training for CHWs to adopt mHealth tools, and improved communication within health care teams working with CHWs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1524839919855391

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Early, J., Gonzalez, C., Gordon-Dseagu, V., & Robles-Calderon, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington Bothell (US)
  • University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Early, Jody
Venue
Health Promotion Practice
Published
2019-06-10
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
805-817
ISSN
  • 1524-8399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6372
OpenAlex
W2949765209
Cited by
122
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11
FWCI
16.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Promotion Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
Keywords
mobile health, community health workers, mobile health intervention, culturally sensitive interventions, CHW training, health care team communication, population health
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Community Health Workers, Community Health Services, Humans, Telemedicine, Health Information Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review