The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Mere Fan Effect on Home-Court Advantage
Abstract
The existence of a home-court advantage is one of the most durable empirical patterns in all of sports. Yet, the mechanisms explaining its strength and persistence remain a mystery in large part because of well-known challenges with statistical identification. We use attendance restrictions in place during the 2020–2021 National Basketball Association regular season as an instrument in order to identify the effect of fans and crowd size on home-court advantage. We show that home teams win by [Formula: see text] points, on average, when fans are present at games compared with [Formula: see text] points when no fans are present. This equates to winning approximately 2.2 additional home games over the course of a regular season. In fixed effects instrumental variables regression models, we estimate that the marginal effect of an additional one thousand fans on home-court advantage is [Formula: see text] points. We conclude that the mere presence of home fans, on its own, explains a larger share of home-court advantage than previously thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ganz and Allsop [34] concluded that fans influence the home team performance with a 1.69-point increase per game and a difference of 5.7 home wins per season when matches are played with spectators [34].”
From The Influence of Home-Court Advantage in Elite Basketball: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 10.3390/ijerph19010228 · DOI
- 10.1177/1527002520930812 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109664 · DOI
- Cross J., Uhrig R. (2022, March). Do Fans Impact Sports Outcomes? A COVID-19 Natural Experiment. Working paper . Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3705085. · DOI
- 10.1111/joes.12106 · DOI
- 10.1162/0034653053970267 · DOI
- 10.1177/15270025211073337 · DOI
- Grasso J., Sports Illustrated
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0256568 · DOI
- Hill Y., Frontiers in Psychology, 12
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00641.x · DOI
- Letourneau C., San Francisco Chronicle
- 10.1080/1612197X.2003.9671718 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-020-78901-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Moore J. C., Journal of Sport Behavior, 16, 77
- 10.2165/00007256-199928040-00001 · DOI · Paper page
- Pace A., Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences—Journal Canadien Des Sciences Du Sport, 17, 60
- 10.1016/j.joep.2020.102344 · DOI
- 10.2202/1559-0410.1192 · DOI
- Sors F., European Journal of Sport Science, 21, 1
- 10.1123/jsep.32.4.483 · DOI
- Wunderlich F., PLOS ONE, 16(3), E0248590
Cited by
The Influence of Home-Court Advantage in Elite Basketball: A Systematic Review
Mochales Cuesta, I., Jiménez-Sáiz, S. L., Kelly, A. L., & Bustamante-Sánchez, Á. (2024) · Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology · doi:10.3390/jfmk9040192 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Ganz, S. C., & Allsop, K.
- Affiliations
- Georgetown MSB and AEI, Washington, DC, USA
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- ORCID
- Allsop, Kieran
- Venue
- Journal of Sports Economics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-09-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-53
- ISSN
- 1527-0025
- 1552-7794
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Mere Fan Effect on Home-Court Advantage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/15270025231200890
- The paper
- Ganz, S. C., & Allsop, K. (2024). A Mere Fan Effect on Home-Court Advantage. Journal of Sports Economics. https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025231200890
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.