Cited by 60Nursing Education, Practice, and LeadershipElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Political Participation of Registered Nurses

Abstract

Level of political participation and factors contributing to participation were measured among Midwest RNs (n = 468) via an online survey (Cronbach's α = .95). Respondents reported engaging in primarily "low cost" activities (e.g., voting, discussing politics, and contacting elected officials), with fewer reporting speaking at public gatherings, participating in demonstrations, and membership in nursing organizations. Psychological engagement was most predictive (p < .001) of political participation with the dimensions of political interest, political efficacy, and political information/knowledge highly significant (p < .001). Resources (time/money/civic skills) significantly contributed to political participation (p < .001). Less than half (40%) felt they could impact local decisions, and fewer (32%) felt they could impact state or national government decisions. Most respondents (80%) indicated their nursing courses lacked political content and did not prepare them for political participation. Findings showed that nurse educators and leaders of professional nursing organizations need to model and cultivate greater psychological engagement among students and nurses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1527154411425189

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nurses' perceptions of preparedness for political participation relates to frequency of advocacy.

    “Nurses’ perceptions of preparedness for political participation relates to frequency of advocacy (Vandenhouten et al, 2011).”

    From Using SBAR to Communicate with Policymakers (2018) · cites this paper as Vandenhouten et al, 2011

  • Perceived lack of skill contributes to decreased advocacy involvement among nurses.

    “Nurses’ perceived ability to speak and present effectively is positively correlated with increased political advocacy, while perceived lack of skill contributes to decreased advocacy involvement (Jansson et al., 2016; Jurns, 2017; Vandenhouten et al., 2011).”

    From Using SBAR to Communicate with Policymakers (2018) · cites this paper as Vandenhouten et al., 2011

  • Nurses' perceived ability to speak and present effectively is positively correlated with increased political advocacy.

    “Nurses’ perceived ability to speak and present effectively is positively correlated with increased political advocacy, while perceived lack of skill contributes to decreased advocacy involvement (Jansson et al., 2016; Jurns, 2017; Vandenhouten et al., 2011).”

    From Using SBAR to Communicate with Policymakers (2018) · cites this paper as Vandenhouten et al., 2011

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Abood S., 2007, The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 12
  2. 10.12968/bjon.1995.4.8.461 · DOI
  3. American Nurses Association, 2001, Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements
  4. 10.1177/019394598300500105 · DOI
  5. Blais K. K., 2011, Professional nursing practice: Concepts and perspectives
  6. 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.11.005 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0091-2182(91)90006-B · DOI
  8. Hanley B. E., 1987, Nursing Economic$, 5, 179
  9. Haylock P. J., 2002, Policy & politics in nursing and health care, 609
  10. Intercollegiate Studies Institute American Civic Literacy Program, 2008, Our fading heritage: Americans fail a basic test on their history and institutions
  11. Lewenson S. B., 2008, Capturing nursing history: A guide to historical methods in research
  12. Mechanic C., 2002, Nursing and Health Policy Review, 1, 7
  13. 10.1097/01.NNE.0000299480.54506.44 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/sw/53.4.347 · DOI
  15. Rosenstone S. J., 2003, Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America
  16. 10.1097/00012272-200012000-00004 · DOI
  17. Shinn L. J., 2002, Policy & politics in nursing and health care, 601
  18. 10.1097/00000446-200407000-00037 · DOI
  19. Verba S., 1972, Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality
  20. 10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vandenhouten, C. L., Malakar, C. L., Kubsch, S., Block, D. E., & Gallagher-Lepak, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Green Bay (US)
  • Bellin Memorial Hospital (US)
Venue
Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice
Published
2011-08
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
159-167
ISSN
  • 1527-1544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7468
OpenAlex
W2142657485
Cited by
60
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Policy Politics & Nursing Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
political participation, registered nurses, psychological engagement, political efficacy, political interest, political knowledge, citizen participation, nursing education, nursing organizations, barriers to participation
MeSH terms
Education, Nursing, Graduate, Female, Health Policy, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Middle Aged, Nurse Clinicians, Policy Making, Politics, United States, Nurse's Role, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review