Cited by 511Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDecolonial Thought and EpistemologiesCultural Studies and Postmodernism

Big Data from the South(s): Beyond Data Universalism

Open access
Milan, Stefania, Treré, Emiliano·2019·Television & New Media

Abstract

This article introduces the tenets of a theory of datafication of and in the Souths. It calls for a de-Westernization of critical data studies, in view of promoting a reparation to the cognitive injustice that fails to recognize non-mainstream ways of knowing the world through data. It situates the “Big Data from the South” research agenda as an epistemological, ontological, and ethical program and outlines five conceptual operations to shape this agenda. First, it suggests moving past the “universalism” associated with our interpretations of datafication. Second, it advocates understanding the South as a composite and plural entity, beyond the geographical connotation (i.e., “global South”). Third, it postulates a critical engagement with the decolonial approach. Fourth, it argues for the need to bring agency to the core of our analyses. Finally, it suggests embracing the imaginaries of datafication emerging from the Souths, foregrounding empowering ways of thinking data from the margins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1527476419837739

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only by viewing different forms of coloniality as entangled is it possible to understand the historical continuity of social injustices in different sites.

    “Only by viewing these di ff erent forms of coloniality as entangled, it is possible to understand the historical continuity of social injustices in di ff erent sites (Couldry and Mejias 2019; Milan and Treré 2019; Ricaurte 2019).”

    From A decolonial approach to AI in higher education teaching and learning: strategies for undoing the ethics of digital neocolonialism (2023) · cites this paper as Milan and Treré 2019

    In “Through the Decolonial Lens” (page unavailable), the paper says that understanding data practices in the Souths requires situating them within historical processes of domination and that capitalism, white supremacy, and heteropatriarchy are interlocking systems. This supports the claim’s emphasis on connected forms of oppression and historical continuity, but not its broader assertion that only this approach makes social injustices across different sites understandable. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Data colonialism reinforces existing inequalities and injustices in the world.

    “Similarly, Milan and Treré (2019) identify and critique the coloniality of big data, as manifested in controlling people for economic, political or other purposes, arguing that data colonialism reinforces existing inequalities and injustices in the world”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Andrejevic, Mark. 2014. "Big Data, Big Questions: The Big Data Divide." International Journal of Communication 8: 1673-89.
  2. Aradau, Claudia, and Tobias Blanke. 2017. "Politics of Prediction: Security and the Time/Space of Governmentality in the Age of Big Data." European Journal of Social Theory 20 (3): 373-91.
  3. Arora, Payal. 2016. "Bottom of the Data Pyramid: Big Data and the Global South." International Journal of Communication 10: 1681-99.
  4. Arora, Payal. 2019. "Decolonizing Privacy Studies." Television & New Media 20 (4): 366-78.
  5. Asher, Kiran. 2013. "Latin American Decolonial Thought, or Making the Subaltern Speak." Geography Compass 7 (12): 832-42.
  6. Barranquero, Alejandro Carretero, and Chiara Saez Baeza. 2017. "Latin American Critical Epistemologies toward a Biocentric Turn in Communication for Social Change: Communication from a Good Living Perspective." Latin American Research Review 52 (3): 431-45.
  7. Bhambra, Gurminder, and Boaventura De Sousa Santos. 2017. "Introduction: Global Challenges for Sociology." Sociology 51 (1): 3-10.
  8. boyd, dana, and Kate Crawford. 2012. "Critical Questions for Big Data. Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon." Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 662-79.
  9. Bringel, Brenno M., and J. M. Domingues. 2017. "Social Theory, Extroversion and Autonomy: Dilemmas of Contemporary (Semi) Peripheral Sociology." Méthod(e)s: African Review of Social Sciences Methodology 2 (1-2): 108-26.
  10. Casilli, Antonio. 2017. "Digital Labor Studies Go Global: Toward a Digital Decolonial Turn." International Journal of Communication 11: 3934-54.
  11. Chakravartty, Paula, Rachel Kuo, Victoria Grubbs, and Charlton D. McIlwain. 2018. "#CommunicationSoWhite." Journal of Communication 68 (2): 254-66.
  12. Chan, Say Anita. 2013. Networking Peripheries. Technological Futures and the Myth of Digital Universalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  13. Chen, Julie Yujie. 2017. "Thrown under the Bus and Outrunning It! The Logic of Didi and Taxi Drivers' Labour and Activism in the on-Demand Economy." New Media & Society 20 (8): 2691-2711.
  14. Chenou, Jean-Marie, and Carolina Cepeda-Másmela. 2019. "#NiUnaMenos: Data Activism from the Global South." Television & New Media 20 (4): 396-411.
  15. Comaroff, Jean, and John Comaroff. 2015. Theory from the South: Or, How Euro-America Is Evolving toward Africa. London: Routledge.
  16. Connell, Raewyn. 2014. "Using Southern Theory: Decolonizing Social Thought in Theory, Research and Application." Planning Theory 13 (2): 210-23.
  17. Cornejo-Polar, Antonio. 1994. "Mestizaje, Transculturacion, Heterogeneidad." [Miscegenation, Transculturality, Heterogeneity] Revista de Crítica Literaria Latinoamericana 20 (40): 368-71.
  18. Couldry, Nick, and Alison Powell. 2014. "Big Data from the Bottom Up." Big Data & Society 1 (2): 1-5.
  19. Cukier, Kenneth, and Viktor Mayer-Schoenberger. 2013. "The Rise of Big Data: How It's Changing the Way We Think about the World." Foreign Affairs 92 (3): 28-40.
  20. Dencik, Lina. In Press. "Situating Practices in Datafication-from above and Below." In Citizen Media and Practice, edited by Hilde Stephansen and Emiliano Treré. London: Routledge.
  21. Dencik, Lina, and Jonathan Cable. 2017. "The Advent of Surveillance Realism: Public Opinion and Activist Responses to the Snowden Leaks." International Journal of Communication 11:763-81.
  22. D'Ignazio, Catherine, and Lauren Klein. 2019. Data Feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  23. Emirbaye, Mustafa, and Ann Mische. 1988. "What Is Agency?" The American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962-1023.
  24. Escobar, Arturo. 2017. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  25. Eubanks, Virginia. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  26. Fricker, Miranda. 2013. "Epistemic Justice as a Condition of Political Freedom?" Synthese 190 (7): 1317-32.
  27. Gabrys, Jennifer, Helen Pritchard, and Benjamin Barratt. 2016. "Just Good Enough Data: Figuring Data Citizenships through Air Pollution Sensing and Data Stories." Big Data & Society 3 (2): 1-14. doi:10.1177/2053951716679677. · DOI
  28. Halkort, Monika. In press. "Decolonising Data: On the Moral Economy of Data Activism in a Lebanese Palestinian Refugee Camp." Canadian Journal of Communication.
  29. Irani, Lilly, Janet Vertesi, Paul Dourish, Kavita Philip, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2010. Postcolonial Computing: A Lens on Design and Development. Atlanta: ACM. http://www. dourish.com/publications/2010/chi2010-postcolonial.pdf.
  30. Kennedy, Helen, and Rosemary Lucy Hill. 2017. "The Feeling of Numbers: Emotions in Everyday Engagements with Data and Their Visualisation." Sociology 52 (4): 830-48.
  31. Kitchin, Rob. 2014. "Big Data, New Epistemologies and Paradigm Shifts." Big Data & Society 6 (1). doi:10.1177/2053951714528481. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Kitchin, Rob, and Tracey Lauriault. 2015. "Small Data in the Era of Big Data." GeoJournal 80 (4): 463-75.
  33. Lehtiniemi, Tuukka, and Minna Ruckenstein. 2019. "The Social Imaginaries of Data Activism." Big Data & Society 6 (1). doi:10.1177/2053951718821146. · DOI
  34. Lyon, David. 2015. Surveillance after Snowden. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  35. Lyon, David. 2018. The Culture of Surveillance: Watching as a Way of Life. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  36. Mann, Monique, and Angela Daly. 2019. "(Big) Data and the North-in-South: Australia's Informational Imperialism and Digital Colonialism." Television & New Media 20 (4): 379-95.
  37. McQuillan, Daniel. 2015. "Algorithmic States of Exception." European Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (4/5): 564-76.
  38. Medina, Eden, Ivan da Costa Marques, and Christina Holmes, eds. 2014. Beyond Imported Magic. Essays on Science, Technology, and Society in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  39. Mignolo, Walter D. 2000. Local Histories/global Designs: Essays on the Coloniality of Power, Subaltern Knowledges and Border Thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  40. Mignolo, Walter D. 2011. The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  41. Milan, Chiara, and Stefania Milan. 2016. "Involving Communities as Skilled Learners: The STRAP Framework." In Methodological Reflections on Researching Communication and Social Change, edited by Norbert Wildermuth and Teke Ngomba, 9-28. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
  42. Milan, Stefania. 2010. "Towards an Epistemology of Engaged Research." International Journal of Communication 4 (2010): 856-58.
  43. Milan, Stefania. 2018. "Political Agency, Digital Traces and Bottom-up Data Practices." International Journal of Communication 12: 507-27.
  44. Milan, Stefania. In press. "Acting on Data(Fication)." In Citizen Media and Practice, edited by Hilde Stephansen and Emiliano Treré. London: Routledge.
  45. Milan, Stefania, and Lonneke van der Velden. 2016. "The Alternative Epistemologies of Data Activism." Digital Culture & Society 2 (2): 57-74.
  46. Mustafa, Ali. 2016. "Algorithmic Racism: A Decolonial Critique." In Proceedings of the 10Th International Society for the Study of Religion. http://www.academia.edu/14124452/ Algorithmic_Racism_-_A_Decolonial_Critique.
  47. Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.
  48. Ong, Jonathan Corpus. 2019. "Toward an Ordinary Ethics of Mediated Humanitarianism: An Agenda for Ethnography." International Journal of Cultural Studies. Published electroni- cally February 13. doi:10.1177/1367877919830095. · DOI
  49. Pelizza, Annalisa. 2019. "Processing Alterity, Enacting Europe: Migrant Registration and Identification as Co-Construction of Individuals and Polities." Science, Technology & Human Values. Published electronically February 6. doi:10.1177/0162243919827927. · DOI
  50. Quijano, A. 2007. "Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality." Cultural Studies 21 (2-3): 168-78.
  51. Radfahrer, Luli. 2018. "The Medium Is the Mediation: Postphenomenological Views on Datacratic Contexts." Matrizes 12 (1): 131-53.
  52. Ricaurte, Paula. 2019. "Data Epistemologies, The Coloniality of Power, and Resistance." Television & New Media 20 (4): 350-65.
  53. Rincón, Omar, and Amparo Marroquín. Forthcoming. "The Latin American 'Lo Popular' as a Theory of Communication: Ways of Seeing Communication Practices." In Citizen Media and Practice, edited by Hilde Stephansen and Emiliano Treré. London: Routledge.
  54. Rodriguez, Clemencia. 2001. Fissures in the Mediascape: An International Study of Citizens' Media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  55. Santos, Boaventura De Sousa. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. London: Routledge.
  56. Schueller, Johar. 2005. "Analogy and (White) Feminist Theory: Thinking Race and the Color of the Cyborg Body." Signs 31 (1): 63-92.
  57. Segura, Maria Soledad, and Silvio Waisbord. 2019. "Between Data Capitalism and Data Citizenship." Television & New Media 20 (4): 412-19.
  58. Srnicek, Nick. 2016. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
  59. Suchman, Lucy. 2006. Human-machine Reconfigurations Plans and Situated Actions. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  60. Thatcher, Jim, David O'Sullivan, and Dillon Mahmoudi. 2016. "Data Colonialism through Accumulation by Dispossession: New Metaphors for Daily Data." Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (6): 990-1006.
  61. Trere, Emiliano. 2019. Hybrid Media Activism. London: Routledge.
  62. van Dijck, José. 2014. "Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology." Surveillance and Society 12 (3): 197-208.
  63. Wajcman, Judy. 2010. "Feminist Theories of Technology." Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1): 143-52.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milan, S., & Treré, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Venue
Television & New Media
Published
2019-04-11
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
319-335
ISSN
  • 1527-4764 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8316
OpenAlex
W2935719450
Cited by
511
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 107 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1
FWCI
75.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Television & New Media (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • York University
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020)
  • H2020 European Research Council (639379)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
Keywords
datafication, Global South, de-Westernization, critical data studies, decolonial approaches, cognitive injustice, epistemology of data, agency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review