The DOI matches its Crossref record; 198 of the 198 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intelligence and Personality as Predictors of Illness and Death: How Researchers in Differential Psychology and Chronic Disease Epidemiology Are Collaborating to Understand and Address Health Inequalities
Open accessAbstract
We describe the research findings that link intelligence and personality traits with health outcomes: health behaviors, morbidity, and mortality.The former field is called cognitive epidemiology, and the latter is known as personological epidemiology.However, intelligence and personality traits are the principal research topics studied by differential psychologists, and so the combined field might be termed differential epidemiology.The importance of bringing this field to wider attention lies in the facts that: the findings overviewed here are relatively new, often known neither to researchers or practitioners; the effect sizes are on a par with better-known, traditional risk factors for illness and death, so they should be broadcast as important; mechanisms of the associations are largely unknown, so they must be explored further; and the findings have yet to be applied, so we write this to encourage diverse interested parties to consider how this might be done.To make the work accessible to as many relevant researchers, practitioners, policy makers and laypersons as possible, we first provide an overview of the basic discoveries regarding intelligence and personality.In both of these areas we describe the nature and structure of the measured phenotypes.Both are well established even though we recognize that this is not always appreciated beyond the cognoscenti.Human intelligence differences are well described by a hierarchy that includes general intelligence (g) at the pinnacle, strongly correlated broad domains of cognitive functioning at a lower level, and specific abilities at the foot.The major human differences in personality are described by five personality factor that attract wide consensus with respect to their number and nature: neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness.As a foundation for the health-related findings, we provide a summary of the research which shows that intelligence and personality differences are: measured reliably and
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.
Edwards, A. W. F., & Falconer, D. S. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529912 · Cited by 21,447
Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences
Klitgaard, R., & Gardner, H. (1984) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324560 · Cited by 13,636
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001 · Cited by 10,647
Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model
Digman, J. M. (1990) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221 · Cited by 6,436
"General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and Measured
Spearman, C. (1904) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1412107 · Cited by 6,207
Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings
Shrout, P. E. (1980) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(80)90063-4 · Cited by 6,010
Madison, P., & Mischel, W. (1968) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421067 · Cited by 4,346
Cited by
DNA methylation age of blood predicts all-cause mortality in later life
Marioni, R. E., Shah, S., McRae, A. F., Chen, B. H., Colicino, E., Harris, S. E., Gibson, J., Henders, A. K., Redmond, P., Cox, S. R., et al. (2015) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0584-6 · Cited by 1,261
Self-citationGenetics and intelligence differences: five special findings
Plomin, R., & Deary, I. J. (2015) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2014.105 · Cited by 702
Self-citationDeary, I. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100353 · Cited by 467
Self-citationLuciano, M., Hagenaars, S. P., Davies, G., Hill, W. D., Clarke, T.-K., Shirali, M., Harris, S. E., Marioni, R. E., Liewald, D. C., Fawns-Ritchie, C., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-017-0013-8 · Cited by 391
Self-citationMETASTROKE Consortium, I. C. F. B. P. G., Hagenaars, S. P., SpiroMeta Consortium, CHARGE Consortium Pulmonary Group, C. C. A. A. L. G., Harris, S. E., Davies, G., Hill, W. D., Liewald, D. C. M., Ritchie, S. J., Marioni, R. E., et al. (2016) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2015.225 · Cited by 350
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Deary, I. J., Weiss, A., & Batty, G. D.
- Venue
- Psychological Science in the Public Interest
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 53-79
- ISSN
- 1539-6053 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-1006
- OpenAlex
- W1982595763
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 198
- FWCI
- 28.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intelligence and Personality as Predictors of Illness and Death: How Researchers in Differential Psychology and Chronic Disease Epidemiology Are Collaborating to Understand and Address Health Inequalities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1529100610387081
- The paper
- Deary, I. J., Weiss, A., & Batty, G. D. (2010). Intelligence and Personality as Predictors of Illness and Death: How Researchers in Differential Psychology and Chronic Disease Epidemiology Are Collaborating to Understand and Address Health Inequalities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610387081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.