Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 437

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 198 of the 198 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intelligence and Personality as Predictors of Illness and Death: How Researchers in Differential Psychology and Chronic Disease Epidemiology Are Collaborating to Understand and Address Health Inequalities

Open access
Deary, Ian J., Weiss, Alexander, Batty, G. David·2010·Psychological Science in the Public Interest

Abstract

We describe the research findings that link intelligence and personality traits with health outcomes: health behaviors, morbidity, and mortality.The former field is called cognitive epidemiology, and the latter is known as personological epidemiology.However, intelligence and personality traits are the principal research topics studied by differential psychologists, and so the combined field might be termed differential epidemiology.The importance of bringing this field to wider attention lies in the facts that: the findings overviewed here are relatively new, often known neither to researchers or practitioners; the effect sizes are on a par with better-known, traditional risk factors for illness and death, so they should be broadcast as important; mechanisms of the associations are largely unknown, so they must be explored further; and the findings have yet to be applied, so we write this to encourage diverse interested parties to consider how this might be done.To make the work accessible to as many relevant researchers, practitioners, policy makers and laypersons as possible, we first provide an overview of the basic discoveries regarding intelligence and personality.In both of these areas we describe the nature and structure of the measured phenotypes.Both are well established even though we recognize that this is not always appreciated beyond the cognoscenti.Human intelligence differences are well described by a hierarchy that includes general intelligence (g) at the pinnacle, strongly correlated broad domains of cognitive functioning at a lower level, and specific abilities at the foot.The major human differences in personality are described by five personality factor that attract wide consensus with respect to their number and nature: neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness.As a foundation for the health-related findings, we provide a summary of the research which shows that intelligence and personality differences are: measured reliably and

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1529100610387081

Cites

198 of 198 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 198 references

Cited by

See all 437

Metadata

Authors
Deary, I. J., Weiss, A., & Batty, G. D.
Venue
Psychological Science in the Public Interest
Published
2010-08
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
53-79
ISSN
  • 1539-6053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-1006
OpenAlex
W1982595763
Cited by
437
References
198
FWCI
28.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intelligence and Personality as Predictors of Illness and Death: How Researchers in Differential Psychology and Chronic Disease Epidemiology Are Collaborating to Understand and Address Health Inequalities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1529100610387081
The paper
Deary, I. J., Weiss, A., & Batty, G. D. (2010). Intelligence and Personality as Predictors of Illness and Death: How Researchers in Differential Psychology and Chronic Disease Epidemiology Are Collaborating to Understand and Address Health Inequalities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610387081

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.