Understanding the Adoption of Voter Identification Laws in the American States
Abstract
Recently, many states have reversed the decades-long trend of facilitating ballot access by enacting a wave of laws requesting or requiring identification from registrants before they vote. Identification laws, however, are not an entirely new phenomenon. We offer new theoretical insights regarding how changes in political power influence the adoption of identification laws. In the most extensive analysis to date, we use event history analysis to examine why states adopted a range of identification laws over the past several decades. We consistently find that the propensity to adopt is greatest when control of the governor’s office and legislature switches to Republicans (relationships not previously identified), and that this likelihood increases further as the size of Black and Latino populations in the state expands. We also find that federal legislation in the form of the Help America Vote Act seems to enhance the effects of switches in partisan control.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As states grow more racially diverse, some voters might demand restrictions on democracy to block the political inclusion and empowerment of new voters of color.
“As states grow more racially diverse due to immigration and internal migration, 15 some voters might demand restrictions on democracy to block the political inclusion and empowerment of new voters of color (Abrajano and Hajnal 2017; Biggers and Hanmer 2017; Myers and Levy 2018).”
From Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding (2023) · cites this paper as Biggers and Hanmer 2017
Cites
The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x · Cited by 1,369 · see citing works
Voter Identification Laws and Turnout in the United States
Highton, B. (2017) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022822 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Principle or a Strategy? Voter Identification Laws and Partisan Competition in the American States
Hicks, W. D., McKee, S. C., Sellers, M., & Smith, D. A. (2015) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912914554039 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding
GRUMBACH, J. M. (2023) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422000934 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
“As states grow more racially diverse due to immigration and internal migration, 15 some voters might demand restrictions on democracy to block the political inclusion and empowerment of new voters of color (Abrajano and Hajnal 2017; Biggers and Hanmer 2017; Myers and Levy 2018).”
BackgroundResultCarey, J., Clayton, K., Helmke, G., Nyhan, B., Sanders, M. S., & Stokes, S. (2019) · Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2020.1790577 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Why the Sky Didn't Fall: Mobilizing Anger in Reaction to Voter ID Laws
Valentino, N. A., & Neuner, F. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12332 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
“Most have been sponsored by Republican legislators and passed by states with Republican governors (Biggers & Hanmer, 2011).”
BackgroundVoter Identification Laws and Turnout in the United States
Highton, B. (2017) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022822 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Rock the Registration: Same Day Registration Increases Turnout of Young Voters
Grumbach, J., & Hill, C. (2021) · Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/714776 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Epperly, B., Witko, C., Strickler, R. W., & White, P. (2019) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592718003584 · Cited by 50
“…electoral calculations matter: research shows that restrictive voting laws are most likely when control of government has recently shifted to the Republican Party, indicating that these states were competitive in the recent past (Biggers and Hanmer 2017; McKee 2015; Rocha and Matsubayashi 2014).”
BackgroundThe Racial Implications of Voter Identification Laws in America
Barreto, M., Nuño, S. A., Sanchez, G. R., & Walker, H. L. (2019) · doi:10.1177/1532673x18810012 · Cited by 49
“Despite claims to electoral integrity, scholars demonstrate that partisan motivations enhance the popularity of these laws (Bentele & O’brien, 2013; Biggers & Hanmer, 2017; Hicks, McKee, Sellers, & Smith, 2015).”
BackgroundStrict ID Laws Don’t Stop Voters: Evidence from a U.S. Nationwide Panel, 2008–2018
Cantoni, E., & Pons, V. (2019) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjab019 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Doubling Down: Inequality in Responsiveness and the Policy Preferences of Elected Officials
Mendez, M., & Grose, C. R. (2018) · Legislative Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/lsq.12204 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
The Determinants of State Legislator Support for Restrictive Voter ID Laws
Hicks, W. D., McKee, S. C., & Smith, D. A. (2016) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1532440016630752 · Cited by 37
Who Do Voter ID Laws Keep from Voting?
Fraga, B. L., & Miller, M. G. (2021) · Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/716282 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“…intentionally target minorities in crafting the list of acceptable IDs or when deciding to introduce voter ID laws at all (Bentele and O’Brien 2013; Biggers and Hanmer 2017; Hicks et al. 2015; Highton 2017; Rocha andMatsubayashi 2014).2 Minority voters might interpret these conditions as a signal…”
BackgroundA disproportionate burden: strict voter identification laws and minority turnout
Kuk, J., Hajnal, Z. L., & Lajevardi, N. (2020) · Politics, Groups, and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2020.1773280 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“…popular with the public (Stewart et al 2016, Gronke et al 2015, Atkeson et al 2014). larger minority populations and greater partisan competition (Biggers and Hanmer 2017; Bentele and O’Brien 2013, Hicks et al 2015, McKee 2015, but see Rocha and Matsubayashi 2014).11 All of this evidence points…”
BackgroundHow conspiracy theories can stimulate political engagement
Kim, Y. (2019) · Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2019.1651321 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Studies have shown that voter suppression, such as restrictive voter identification laws, target Democrats and have been implemented in states with Republican legislative majorities and Republican governors (Biggers and Hanmer 2017). Voter suppression, especially a stringent voter identification law causes disenfranch…”
BackgroundPopulism and the American Party System: Opportunities and Constraints
Lee, F. E. (2019) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592719002664 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“Along these lines, since 2004 Republican-controlled states have enacted a variety of “anti-voter fraud” measures that disproportionately burden poor, minority, and Democratic voters (Biggers and Hanmer 2017).”
BackgroundLandgrave, M., & Weller, N. (2020) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x20923588 · Cited by 26
“…in their responses, then we would expect them to be more likely to bring up ID requirements or felon disqualification laws when responding to a Black constituent, because these issues disproportionally affect Black voters (Barreto et al., 2018; Biggers & Hanmer, 2017; Cottrell et al., 2019).”
Challenges to Subnational Democracy in the United States, Past and Present
Mickey, R. (2022) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162211072952 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“…sometimes enunciate publicly, these initiatives are fine-tuned to reduce turnout of voters of color, young voters, and so on. thus, this is a partisan effort that exploits the political weakness of certain groups of voters assumed to vote for Democratic candidates (biggers and Hanmer 2017).”
BackgroundPartisan Predispositions and Public Support for Making It Easier to Vote
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2018) · doi:10.1177/1532673x18763875 · Cited by 20
“…20 Republican House supporting it.2 The parties remain divided on the merits of EDR and photo ID. States adopting EDR since 2010 are nearly exclusively Democratic,3 whereas Republicans have been the primary actors promoting strict photo ID laws (Bentele & O’Brien, 2013; Biggers & Hanmer, 2017).”
BackgroundThe Effect of Core Values on Support for Electoral Reform: Evidence from Two Survey Experiments
Virgin, S. G. (2021) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12658 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Election type and the logic of pre-election violence: Evidence from Zimbabwe
Daxecker, U. E., & Rauschenbach, M. (2023) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102583 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Juelich, C. L., & Coll, J. A. (2020) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x20920265 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Biggers, D. R. (2019) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-019-09587-0 · Cited by 14
Self-citationThe Rule, Not the Exception: One-Party Monopolies in the American States
Parry, J. A., Dowdle, A. J., Long, A. B., & Kloss, J. (2022) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1017/spq.2022.2 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
A Right Restricted: Racial Threat and the Sponsorship of Restrictive Voting Laws
Morris, K. T. (2023) · The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics · doi:10.1017/rep.2023.26 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Biggers and Hanmer (2017) similarly find that states with larger Black populations are more likely to adopt voter ID laws — especially when a Republican resides in the governor ’ s mansion.”
BackgroundThe Suppressive Impacts of Voter Identification Requirements
Darrah-Okike, J., Rita, N., & Logan, J. (2020) · Sociological perspectives · doi:10.1177/0731121420966620 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Mann, C. B., Gronke, P., & Adona, N. (2020) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x20922525 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Partisanship plays a central role in debates about election reform legislation (Bentele & O’Brien, 2013; Biggers & Hanmer, 2015, 2017; Hasen, 2013; Hicks et al., 2016a, 2016b).”
BackgroundExclusionary Citizenship: Public Punitiveness and Support for Voting Restrictions
Chouhy, C., Lehmann, P. S., & Singer, A. J. (2022) · Justice quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2022.2111324 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“…process, restriction of voting opportunities, and—most salient for the current study—the adoption of ID requirements for casting a ballot (Biggers & Hanmer, 2017; Nowacki et al., 2020; Shah & Smith, 2021).2 The contexts in which voter ID laws have emerged highlight the partisan divide…”
BackgroundCost of Voting in the American States: 2024
Pomante, M. J. (2024) · Election Law Journal · doi:10.1089/elj.2024.0037 · Cited by 9
“Previous work has demonstrated that Republicans are likelier to adopt strict voter ID laws (Biggers and Hanmer, 2017) and less likely to adopt same-day voter registration when Black voters reach a certain threshold (Caron, 2022).”
The Costs of Voting and Voter Confidence
Atkeson, L., McKown‐Dawson, E., & Stein, R. M. (2024) · Political research quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129241283169 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“We might expect that Republican states adopt laws restricting access to the ballot while Democratic states adopt laws maximizing access to the ballots (Biggers and Hanmer 2017).”
Partisan Strategy and the Adoption of Same-Day Registration in the American States
Caron, C. (2021) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1017/spq.2021.32 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Getting the Message: Opinion Polarization over Election Law
Hood, M., & McKee, S. C. (2022) · Election Law Journal · doi:10.1089/elj.2021.0038 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Most of the literature examining state legislator voting behavior on election reform has keyed in on voter identification (ID) provisions (e.g., Biggers and Hanmer 2017; Hicks et al. 2015) due to the per-vasiveness of this issue, raised and advanced by Republican lawmakers throughout the United…”
Nteta, T., Rhodes, J. H., Wall, G., Dixon-Gordon, K., Raja, R. J. L., Lickel, B., Mah, A., Macwilliams, M., Markowitz, E., Reid, A. E., et al. (2023) · Political research quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129231151413 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The media, voter fraud, and the U.S. 2012 elections
Fogarty, B. J., Kimball, D., & Kosnik, L.-R. (2020) · Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2019.1711383 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“…states passed new voter identification laws between 2011 and 2013 (Brennan Center for Justice 2013), and these laws have been passed almost exclusively with Republican votes in states where the GOP controls the legislative process (Bentele and O’Brien 2013; McKee 2015; Biggers and Hanmer 2017).”
BackgroundDisparate Racial Impacts of Shelby County V. Holder on Voter Turnout
Billings, S. B., Braun, N., Jones, D. B., & Shi, Y. (2024) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4310237 · Cited by 6
Photo identification laws and perceptions of electoral fraud
Endres, K., & Panagopoulos, C. (2021) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/20531680211030435 · Cited by 6
“These partisan divisions appear to extend to the elite level as well (Bowler and Donovan, 2016), as evidenced by the passage of more rigorous ID restrictions in states where Republicans controlled the legislatures at the time of enactment (Biggers and Hanmer, 2017; Hale and McNeal, 2010).”
BackgroundVoting Infrastructure and Process: Another Form of Voter Suppression?
Pitzer, K., Mcclendon, G. G., & Sherraden, M. W. (2021) · Social Service Review · doi:10.1086/714491 · Cited by 6
“…number of polling locations, cuts in voting times (Brennan Center for Justice n.d.), and voter-identification laws (Mycoff, Wagner, and Wilson 2009; Citrin, Green, and Levy 2014; Blessett 2015; Biggers and Hanmer 2017; Radomski 2017; Burden 2018). apparatus (e.g., signage and polling equipment).”
Designing Voter Education Across the States: State Responses to the Help America Vote Act
Merivaki, T., & Suttmann-Lea, M. (2021) · Election Law Journal · doi:10.1089/elj.2020.0638 · Cited by 5
“Given that partisan-ship explains variation in other aspects of election policy (Biggers and Hanmer 2017; 2015), we evaluate differences based on the partisanship of the state CEO, who is the designated official to oversee”
Public opinion on reforming U.S. primaries
Boatright, R., Tolbert, C. J., & Micatka, N. (2024) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.13370 · Cited by 4
“…above that previous research has emphasized the role of partisan cues and partisan self-interest in attitudes about changing election laws (e.g., Alvarez et al. 2011; Bowler and Donovan 2018; Coll et al. 2022; Biggers 2019; Biggers and Hanmer 2017; McCarthy 2019; Mann, Gronke, and Adona 2020).”
Jansa, J. M., Motta, M. P., & Herrick, R. (2021) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x211055050 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…base voters, strategic parties will seek to use control of state government to shape voting policies in a way that helps their base voters and/or hinders their opponents’ voters from turning out (Bentele & O’Brien, 2013; Rocha & Matsubayashi, 2014; Hicks et al., 2015; Biggers & Hanmer, 2017).”
BackgroundComparing Two Measures of Electoral Integrity in the American States
Flavin, P., & Shufeldt, G. (2019) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1532440018800338 · Cited by 4
“…some state work to make voter registration automatic—while others have passed legislation to protect the integrity of elections—for example, by passing more restrictive photo identification laws (Alvarez and Grofman 2014; Biggers and Hanmer 2015; 2017; Hanmer 2009; Hicks et al. 2015; Stewart 2014).”
Citizens’ perceptions of the quality of democracy in the American states
Flavin, P., & Shufeldt, G. (2024) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.13359 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Coll, J. A. (2023) · Politics, Groups, and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2022.2158889 · Cited by 3
“…all published studies that have examined the adoption of voter IDs fi nd states where conservatives or Republicans have greater control of government are more likely to adopt these requirements (Bentele and O ’ brien 2013; Biggers and Hanmer 2017; Hicks et al. 2015; Rocha and Matsubayashi 2014).”
Divergent Electoral Policies: Why Some States Increase Ballot Access
Smith, K. B., Hill, D., & Ancheva, S. (2022) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1017/spq.2022.22 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Implementing voter ID: lessons from Missouri, USA
Anthony, J., & Kimball, D. (2019) · Building Inclusive Elections · doi:10.1080/01442872.2019.1694653 · Cited by 3
“Many states have passed new laws that require people to show photo identification to vote, particularly in ethnically diverse states with Republican Party control of state government (Hale andMcNeal 2010; Bentele and O’Brien 2013; Rocha and Matsubayashi 2014; Biggers and Hanmer 2017).”
BackgroundQuirós, S., & O'Hare, W. P. (2024) · Population: Research and Policy Review · doi:10.1007/s11113-024-09918-y · Cited by 2
“Researchers often find that as racial and ethnic diversity increases in a geographic location, so does the introduction of bills or passage of laws to curtail these groups’ rights (Biggers & Hanmer, 2017; Morris, 2023, 2024).”
American Democracy and Voter Suppression
Fraga, L. R., Ramírez, R., & Fraga, B. L. (2023) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162241232825 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…larger numbers of non-citizens, restrictive-access legislation is more likely to be proposed” (1098) and that Republican control of the legislative process is the only predictor more strongly tied to the introduction of voter suppression measures, a finding confirmed by Biggers and Hanmer (2017).”
BackgroundResultBiggers, D. R. (2018) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9481-5 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationA Network Comparison of the Diffusion of State Electoral Laws
LaCombe, S., Tolbert, C. J., & Harper, S. F. (2025) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x251347608 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Rocha and Tetsuya (2014) show that states with Republican-controlled legislatures and larger non-white populations are more likely to adopt voter ID laws (see also Bentele and O ’ Brien 2013; Biggers & Hanmer, 2017; Hale & McNeal, 2010).”
Shaping the Narrative: Examining News Coverage of Voter ID Laws in the United States
Alonso-Curbelo, A., Trilling, D., Simon, M., & Kroon, A. (2024) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2024.2412211 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…the Republican argument that voter fraud justifies voter ID laws (the “voter fraud frame”) and the Democratic argument that the laws are discriminatory (the “voter suppression frame”) (see for example, Biggers and Hanmer 2017; Conover and Miller 2018; Edelson et al. 2017; Gronke et al. 2019).”
Partisan (A) Symmetries in Hardball: Mass Level Support of Hardball Equivalent Across Party and Race
Kidd, W. (2024) · Political research quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129241292564 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…legal acts can violate the spirit of the law if done to ensure one-party control, such as when legislatures intentionally seek to make it harder for minorities to vote through carefully crafted voter id laws or targeted closings of polling stations (Biggers and Hanmer 2017; Odujinrin 2021).”
The Ghosts of Calhoun: Nullifying the 15th Amendment and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 since Shelby
Samuels, A. (2022) · National Review of Black Politics · doi:10.1525/nrbp.2022.3.3-4.83 · Cited by 1
The Effects of Proportional Representation on Election Lawmaking: Evidence from New Zealand
Ferrer, J. (2022) · Representation · doi:10.1080/00344893.2022.2032292 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“This also comports with evidence in the United States that uni fi ed Republican control is the most important determinant to explaining the adoption of voting restriction (Bentele & O ’ Brien, 2013; Biggers & Hanmer, 2017; Grumbach, 2021; Hicks et al., 2015).”
A Voter's Eye View of Elections, 2008-2016
Stewart, C. (2019) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3361952 · Cited by 1
Citizen Assessment of Electoral Reforms: Do Evaluations of Fairness Blunt Self-Interest?
Biggers, D. R., & Bowler, S. (2021) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-021-09723-9
Self-citationPartisanship and Voting Rule Trade-offs
Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., Miller, M. G., & Milyo, J. (2026) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x261470402
“At the elite level, considerable evidence suggests that the adoption of restrictive voting laws is shaped by the strategic interests of governing parties (e.g., Biggers & Hanmer, 2017).”
Moving the electoral goalposts: State and local strategies of electoral intervention in the U.S.
Sheely, G. (2024) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102771
College Student Registration and Voting in the Time of COVID-19
Hanmer, M., Niemi, R., & Jackson, T. (2020) · Election Law Journal · doi:10.1089/elj.2020.0664
Self-citationUnderstanding and Confronting Barriers to Youth Voting in America
McDonald, J., & Hanmer, M. (2019) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2019-42qw1
“And as Biggers and Hanmer (2017) note, “if Republicans were mostly concerned vote buying and intimidation.””
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationStrengthening Democracy by Design: Challenges and Opportunities
Thomas, N., & Upchurch, J. (2018) · doi:10.16997/jdd.311
“First, after years in which most electoral reforms were aimed at easing voter access, voter identification laws have become increasingly prevalent in recent decades (Biggers & Hanmer, 2017).”
Background
- Authors
- Biggers, D. R., & Hanmer, M. J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Biggers, Daniel R.
- Venue
- American Politics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-01-16
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 560-588
- ISSN
- 0044-7803 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-673X
- 1552-3373
- OpenAlex
- W2574388879
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 54.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Politics Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Notre Dame
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- voter ID laws, ballot access, state legislation, partisan control, Republican governors, racial and ethnic minorities, Black voters, Latino voters, Help America Vote Act
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review