Cited by 93Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-votingPolitical Conflict and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Voter Identification Laws and Turnout in the United States

Open access
Highton, Benjamin·2017·Annual Review of Political Science

Abstract

This article analyzes voter identification laws in the United States and their effects on voter turnout. Theoretically, there are plausible reasons to hypothesize turnout lowering effects, though there are also reasons to hypothesize those effects might be minimal. Methodologically, there are research design hurdles to clear in order to produce effect estimates that may be attributed to voter identification laws. Empirically, a small number of studies have employed suitable research designs and generally find modest, if any, turnout effects of voter identification laws. This may indicate that voter identification laws have only minor effects on turnout, or it may be due to the fact that the type of voter identification law that may have the most significant effects—a strict photo identification law—is a relatively recent phenomenon. Future elections and the related additional data may make it possible to adjudicate among these possibilities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022822

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over the past 15 years, a wave of state laws has aimed to make it harder for likely Democratic supporters to register and vote.

    “Concerns about antidemocratic restrictions on participation stem from the wave of state laws aimed to make it more difficult for likely supporters of Democratic candidates to register and cast their ballots.”

    From Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding (2018) · cites this paper as Highton 2017

  • These restrictive voting laws are most common in states where Republicans recently won legislative majorities.

    “These laws have emerged over the past 15 years and are most common where Republicans have recently won state legislative majorities”

    From Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding (2018) · cites this paper as Highton 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. De Alth S, 2009, Harvard Law Policy Rev, 3, 185
  2. Gillespie JA, 2015, Phylon, 52, 43
  3. Kousser JM, 1974, The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restrictions and the Establishment of the One-Party South, 1880–1910
  4. NCSL (Natl. Conf. State Legis.)., 2016, Voter ID history
  5. NCSL (Natl. Conf. State Legis.)., 2016, Voter identification requirements/voter ID laws
  6. NCSL (Natl. Conf. State Legis.)., 2016, Voter verification without ID documents
  7. 10.2307/1953324 · DOI
  8. Stewart C, 2013, Okla. Law Rev., 66, 21
  9. Wolfinger RE, 1980, Who Votes?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Highton, B.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Highton, Benjamin
Venue
Annual Review of Political Science
Published
2017-05-11
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
149-167
ISSN
  • 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1577
OpenAlex
W2581049976
Cited by
93
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
16.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
voter ID laws, voter turnout, photo-identification, voting access, electoral law, research design, effect estimation, United States elections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review