Examining Trends in Ideological Identification: 1972–2016
Abstract
Has polarization influenced how members of the public identify with ideological labels? In our analysis of patterns of ideological identification since the 1970s, we demonstrate that there has been an increase in the proportion of the electorate willing to locate themselves on the standard seven-point ideological scale as the parties have polarized. Moreover, consistent with existing evidence of partisan-ideological sorting, our results indicates that most of the increase in identifying with a label is associated with an increase in partisans selecting the ideological label that matches their partisanship. Finally, we show that attitudes toward moral traditionalism are increasingly related to ideological identifications. Our evidence indicates that the broader political system influences how members of the public identify with ideological labels.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals who identify as more liberal and endorse more leftist attitudes place a higher value on equality and progressive forms of social change than those who identify as more conservative and rightist.
“By contrast, those who identify as more liberal and endorse more leftist attitudes place a higher value on equality and progressive forms of social change43,47,82,107,171–173.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [173]
Individuals who identify as more conservative and endorse more rightist attitudes place a higher value on tradition, social order and stability, and the maintenance of existing hierarchical social arrangements than those who identify as more liberal and leftist.
“those who identify as more conservative and endorse more rightist attitudes place a higher value on tradition, social order and stability, and the maintenance of existing hierarchical social arrangements.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [173]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Halliez, A. A., & Thornton, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thornton, Judd R.
- Venue
- American Politics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-11-03
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-268
- ISSN
- 0044-7803 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-673X
- 1552-3373
- OpenAlex
- W3095149138
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Politics Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Academic Freedom and Politics
- Keywords
- ideological identification, political polarization, traditional morality, partisanship, public opinion trends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review