The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The Two Row Wampum-Covenant Chain Tradition as a Guide for Indigenous-University Research Partnerships
Abstract
This co-authored article examines the oldest known treaty between incoming Europeans and Indigenous North Americans to derive five basic principles to guide healthy, productive relationships between Indigenous community-based researchers and university-based ones. Rick Hill, Tuscarora artist and knowledge keeper from the Six Nations of the Grand River, publishes for the first time here the most complete oral history that exists today of that ancient treaty, from the early seventeenth century, known as the Two Row Wampum or the Covenant Chain agreement. Interspersed with Dr. Hill’s reflections, Daniel Coleman, a settler professor of English and Cultural Studies at McMaster University, outlines five principles for research partnerships derived from the discussions of the Two Row Research Partnership seminars that Hill and Coleman have been hosting at Deyohahá:ge: Indigenous Knowledge Centre for the past four years. Formed between the Hodinöhsö:ni’ confederacy and Dutch merchants arriving near Albany, New York in 1609, the Two Row Wampum-Covenant Chain treaty set the precedent for nation-to-nation treaties between European colonial powers and Indigenous peoples with two parallel rows representing the Hodinöhsö:ni’ canoe and the Dutch ship sailing down the shared river. Each party agreed to keep their beliefs and laws in their separate vessels, and on this basis of interdependent autonomy, they established a long-lasting friendship. This article suggests that by renewing our understanding of the Two Row Wampum-Covenant Chain treaty, Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers alike can rebuild relationships of trust and cooperation that can decolonize Western presumptions and re-establish healthy and productive research partnerships.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The two-row wampum treaty explicitly outlined a dialogical IndigenousEuropean framework for how healthy relationships between peoples from different 'laws and beliefs' can be established.”
From Relational Systems Thinking: That's How Change is Going to Come, From Our Earth Mother (2021) · cites this paper as Hill & Coleman, 2019
In the citing paper
“Hill and Coleman (2019) argue that the treaty conveyed the concept of reciprocity between autonomous powers and serves as a guide for cross-cultural, cross-epistemological research (p. 340).”
From Relational Systems Thinking: That's How Change is Going to Come, From Our Earth Mother (2021) · cites this paper as Hill & Coleman, 2019
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 45
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Antone B., 2016, Webinar presentation, Cultural fluency seminar series, Deyohahá:ge.
- Battiste M., 2000, Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision
- Borrows J., 2002, Recovering Canada: The resurgence of Indigenous law
- Chilisa B., 2012, Indigenous research methodologies
- 10.3138/9781442677104 · DOI
- 10.3138/9781442683358 · DOI
- Coleman D., 2011, Narratives of citizenship: Indigenous and diasporic peoples unsettle the nation-state, 177
- Coleman D., 2012, The public intellectual and the culture of hope, 205
- Coleman D., 2015, Unravelling encounters: Ethics, knowledge, and resistance under neoliberalism, 265, 10.51644/9781771120951-013 · DOI
- Justice D. H, 2014, The world of indigenous North America, 291
- Deer T., 2008, Club native
- Dennis M., 1993, Cultivating a landscape of peace: Iroquois-European encounters in seventeenth-century America
- Deyohahá:ge: Indigenous Knowledge Centre, 2009, Hodinohsoni / Rotinonhsyonni intellectual rights and responsibilities
- Ermine W., 2007, Indigenous Law Journal, 6, 193
- Freeman B. M., 2015, The spirit of haudenosaunee youth: The transformation of identity and well-being through culture-based activism
- Hall S., 1992, Formations of modernity, 275
- 10.1080/2201473X.2014.1000909 · DOI
- Hill R., 1992, Indian roots of American democracy, 149
- Hill R., 2001, The future of the past: Archeologists, native Americans, and repatriation, 127
- Hill R., 2009, Mamow be-mo-tay-tah: Let us walk together, 17
- Hill R., 2012, War Clubs and Wampum Belts: Hodinöhsö:ni Experiences of the War of 1812
- 10.1515/9780887554575 · DOI
- Johnson W., 1921, The papers of Sir William Johnson: Prepared for publication by the division of archives and history, 1
- Kelsey P. M., 2014, Reading the wampum: Essays on Hodinöhsö:ni’ visual code and epistemological recovery
- Kovach M., 2009, Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts
- 10.18584/iipj.2015.6.2.7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00443.x · DOI
- 10.1353/aiq.2007.0013 · DOI
- 10.1163/18770703-00301005 · DOI
- Richter D., 1982, Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society, 92, 45
- Santos B. D. S., 2007, Another knowledge is possible: Beyond northern epistemologies
- Schnarch B., 2004, Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1, 80
- Simpson L. B., 2014, Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3, 1
- Smith L. T., 1999, Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples
- Sunseri L., 2007, Junctures, 9, 93
- Van Loon L. G, 1968, The Indian Historian, 1, 22
- Watts V., 2013, Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2, 20
- Wilson S., 2008, Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods
- Womack C. S., 2008, Reasoning together, 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Hill, R. W., & Coleman, D.
- Affiliations
- Six Nations Polytechnic, Ohsweken, Ontario, Canada
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Coleman, Daniel
- ORCID
- Coleman, Daniel
- Venue
- Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-11-26
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 339-359
- ISSN
- 1532-7086 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-356X
- OpenAlex
- W2903308238
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Culture Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- Two Row Wampum, indigenous knowledge, intercultural studies, decolonization, Indigenous sovereignty, Six Nations of the Grand River, Dutch colonialism, trust building, oral history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Two Row Wampum-Covenant Chain Tradition as a Guide for Indigenous-University Research Partnerships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1532708618809138
- The paper
- Hill, R. W., & Coleman, D. (2019). The Two Row Wampum-Covenant Chain Tradition as a Guide for Indigenous-University Research Partnerships. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708618809138