Cited by 45Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsIndigenous Cultures and HistoryDecolonial Thought and Epistemologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The Two Row Wampum-Covenant Chain Tradition as a Guide for Indigenous-University Research Partnerships

Hill, Richard W., Coleman, Daniel·2019·Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies

Abstract

This co-authored article examines the oldest known treaty between incoming Europeans and Indigenous North Americans to derive five basic principles to guide healthy, productive relationships between Indigenous community-based researchers and university-based ones. Rick Hill, Tuscarora artist and knowledge keeper from the Six Nations of the Grand River, publishes for the first time here the most complete oral history that exists today of that ancient treaty, from the early seventeenth century, known as the Two Row Wampum or the Covenant Chain agreement. Interspersed with Dr. Hill’s reflections, Daniel Coleman, a settler professor of English and Cultural Studies at McMaster University, outlines five principles for research partnerships derived from the discussions of the Two Row Research Partnership seminars that Hill and Coleman have been hosting at Deyohahá:ge: Indigenous Knowledge Centre for the past four years. Formed between the Hodinöhsö:ni’ confederacy and Dutch merchants arriving near Albany, New York in 1609, the Two Row Wampum-Covenant Chain treaty set the precedent for nation-to-nation treaties between European colonial powers and Indigenous peoples with two parallel rows representing the Hodinöhsö:ni’ canoe and the Dutch ship sailing down the shared river. Each party agreed to keep their beliefs and laws in their separate vessels, and on this basis of interdependent autonomy, they established a long-lasting friendship. This article suggests that by renewing our understanding of the Two Row Wampum-Covenant Chain treaty, Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers alike can rebuild relationships of trust and cooperation that can decolonize Western presumptions and re-establish healthy and productive research partnerships.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1532708618809138

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 45

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Antone B., 2016, Webinar presentation, Cultural fluency seminar series, Deyohahá:ge.
  2. Battiste M., 2000, Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision
  3. Borrows J., 2002, Recovering Canada: The resurgence of Indigenous law
  4. Chilisa B., 2012, Indigenous research methodologies
  5. 10.3138/9781442677104 · DOI
  6. 10.3138/9781442683358 · DOI
  7. Coleman D., 2011, Narratives of citizenship: Indigenous and diasporic peoples unsettle the nation-state, 177
  8. Coleman D., 2012, The public intellectual and the culture of hope, 205
  9. Coleman D., 2015, Unravelling encounters: Ethics, knowledge, and resistance under neoliberalism, 265, 10.51644/9781771120951-013 · DOI
  10. Justice D. H, 2014, The world of indigenous North America, 291
  11. Deer T., 2008, Club native
  12. Dennis M., 1993, Cultivating a landscape of peace: Iroquois-European encounters in seventeenth-century America
  13. Deyohahá:ge: Indigenous Knowledge Centre, 2009, Hodinohsoni / Rotinonhsyonni intellectual rights and responsibilities
  14. Ermine W., 2007, Indigenous Law Journal, 6, 193
  15. Freeman B. M., 2015, The spirit of haudenosaunee youth: The transformation of identity and well-being through culture-based activism
  16. Hall S., 1992, Formations of modernity, 275
  17. 10.1080/2201473X.2014.1000909 · DOI
  18. Hill R., 1992, Indian roots of American democracy, 149
  19. Hill R., 2001, The future of the past: Archeologists, native Americans, and repatriation, 127
  20. Hill R., 2009, Mamow be-mo-tay-tah: Let us walk together, 17
  21. Hill R., 2012, War Clubs and Wampum Belts: Hodinöhsö:ni Experiences of the War of 1812
  22. 10.1515/9780887554575 · DOI
  23. Johnson W., 1921, The papers of Sir William Johnson: Prepared for publication by the division of archives and history, 1
  24. Kelsey P. M., 2014, Reading the wampum: Essays on Hodinöhsö:ni’ visual code and epistemological recovery
  25. Kovach M., 2009, Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts
  26. 10.18584/iipj.2015.6.2.7 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00443.x · DOI
  28. 10.1353/aiq.2007.0013 · DOI
  29. 10.1163/18770703-00301005 · DOI
  30. Richter D., 1982, Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society, 92, 45
  31. Santos B. D. S., 2007, Another knowledge is possible: Beyond northern epistemologies
  32. Schnarch B., 2004, Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1, 80
  33. Simpson L. B., 2014, Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3, 1
  34. Smith L. T., 1999, Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples
  35. Sunseri L., 2007, Junctures, 9, 93
  36. Van Loon L. G, 1968, The Indian Historian, 1, 22
  37. Watts V., 2013, Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2, 20
  38. Wilson S., 2008, Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods
  39. Womack C. S., 2008, Reasoning together, 3

Metadata

Authors
Hill, R. W., & Coleman, D.
Affiliations
  • Six Nations Polytechnic, Ohsweken, Ontario, Canada
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Coleman, Daniel
Venue
Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies
Published
2018-11-26
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
339-359
ISSN
  • 1532-7086 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-356X
OpenAlex
W2903308238
Cited by
45
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Culture Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
Keywords
Two Row Wampum, indigenous knowledge, intercultural studies, decolonization, Indigenous sovereignty, Six Nations of the Grand River, Dutch colonialism, trust building, oral history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Two Row Wampum-Covenant Chain Tradition as a Guide for Indigenous-University Research Partnerships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1532708618809138
The paper
Hill, R. W., & Coleman, D. (2019). The Two Row Wampum-Covenant Chain Tradition as a Guide for Indigenous-University Research Partnerships. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708618809138