Ethnography and Public Scholarship: Ethical Obligations, Tensions, and Opportunities
Abstract
The article introduces the special issue, “Ethnography and Public Scholarship: Ethical Obligations, Tensions, and Opportunities.” The editors begin with a discussion of Alice Goffman’s On the Run. The popularity and influence of Goffman’s ethnography, coupled with critique and controversy, represent the promise and peril of ethnography as public scholarship. The case operates as a portal to explore at once familiar and still often unanswered methodological and ethical questions as ethnographers engage in public scholarship. After reviewing key considerations, the editors provide snapshots of the papers, papers that explore topics such as ethnography as policy-relevant research, representations of marginalized populations, compliance with regulatory agencies, protection of participants’ rights, and documentation and sharing of data. Recognizing the importance of Mills’ appeal to encourage the sociological imagination, the editors argue that, taken as a whole, the papers demonstrate complex methodological and ethical considerations as well as immense possibilities to inform and reframe social issues.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research
(2009) · Qualitative Market Research An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13522750910948815 · Cited by 2,359 · see citing works
Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public
Anfara, V. A., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x031007028 · Cited by 1,362 · see citing works
Rios, V. M. (2011) · New York University Press eBooks · doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814777114.001.0001 · Cited by 1,270 · see citing works
Goffman, A. (2014) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226136851.001.0001 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
Qualitative Research and Institutional Review Boards
Lincoln, Y. S., & Tierney, W. G. (2004) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800403262361 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Self-citationBureaucracies of Mass Deception: Institutional Review Boards and the Ethics of Ethnographic Research
Bosk, C. L., & Vries, R. G. D. (2004) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716204266913 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research
Smart, J. C., & Tierney, W. G. (2002) · Higher education · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0245-5 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Spin cycle: how research is used in policy debates: the case of charter schools
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-1028 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Interrogating Ethnography: Why Evidence Matters
Eisenberg, A. F. (2019) · TRAILS: Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Whales Tales, Dog Piles, and Beer Goggles: An Ethnographic Case Study of Fraternity Life
Rhoads, R. A. (1995) · Anthropology & Education Quarterly · doi:10.1525/aeq.1995.26.3.05x0935y · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Andrews, C. K. (2017) · The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology · doi:10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss205.pub2 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Rios, V. M. (2015) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/681075 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Alperín, J. P., Nieves, C. M., Schimanski, L. A., Fischman, G. E., Niles, M. T., & McKiernan, E. C. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.42254.018 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Clemens R. F., 2019, The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA)
- Clemens R. F., 2016, The Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association
- Fielding N., 2012, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13
- Forgacs D., 2000, The Gramsci reader
- Authors
- Clemens, R. F., & Lincoln, Y. S.
- Affiliations
- St. John's University (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clemens, Randall F.
- Venue
- Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-07-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 383-388
- ISSN
- 1532-7086 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-356X
- OpenAlex
- W3038546704
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Culture Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
- Keywords
- public scholarship, ethnography, research ethics, sociological imagination, policy-relevant research, research participant protection, research regulation, methodological tensions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
