CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesCancer survivorship and careTraditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using Mixed Methods for Evaluating an Integrative Approach to Cancer Care: A Case Study

Open access
Brazier, Alison, Cooke, Karen, Moravan, Veronika·2008·Integrative Cancer Therapies
DOI 10.1177/1534735407313395
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the impact of participating in an integrative cancer care program at the Centre for Integrated Healing in Vancouver, British Columbia, on patients' lifestyle, quality of life, and overall well-being. Study design A mixed-methods case study with a pre- and posttest design. No control group was utilized. Methods All new patients starting at the Centre for Integrated Healing between May and September of 2004 were invited to join the study. Forty-six of 77 new patients agreed to participate. Quantitative data measuring quality of life, social support, anxiety and depression, locus of control, and hope were assessed at baseline (pre-program start) and at 6 weeks and 5 months from the start of the program. Qualitative data in the form of focus groups and interviews were collected midway through the follow-up period to further explore program impacts. Results No statistically significant improvements or declines were noted on the quantitative measures between baseline and the 5-month follow-up point. The qualitative findings revealed a theme of patients' active engagement in their cancer care involving empowered decision making and creating personal change. Facilitators of active patient engagement in their own care from the integrative program included healing partnerships with practitioners, information and resources, managing the integration of complementary and conventional therapies, emotional support, and a sense of hope. Discussion This case study was a…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1534735407313395

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Inspire Health., Information
  2. Ritenbaugh C., 2003, Altern Ther Health Med., 9, 32
  3. 10.1089/acm.2004.10.651 · DOI
  4. Morse J. Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003:189-208.
  5. Onwuegbuzie AJ , Teddlie C. A framework for analyzing data in mixed-methods research. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003:351-383.
  6. Brazier A., 2003, Assessing the impacts of integrated cancer care: a qualitative pilot study
  7. 10.1037/0022-006X.44.4.580 · DOI
  8. Bjelland I., 2002, J Psychiatr Res, 52, 69
  9. Herth K., 1991, Schol Inquiry Nurs Pract., 5, 39

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Brazier, A., Cooke, K., & Moravan, V.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Health Research Consultant
  • BC Cancer Agency (CA)
Corresponding author
Brazier, Alison
ORCID
Moravan, Veronika
Venue
Integrative Cancer Therapies
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2008-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
5-17
ISSN
  • 1534-7354 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-695X
DOI
10.1177/1534735407313395
OpenAlex
W2024522567
Cited by
40
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Integrative Cancer Therapies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Lotte and John Hecht Memorial Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Research
Keywords
integrative cancer care, complementary therapy, holistic care, patient engagement, quality of life, well-being, social support, anxiety and depression, locus of control, hope, patient empowerment, decision-making, program evaluation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Complementary Therapies, British Columbia, Female, Patient Care, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Focus Groups, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review