Cited by 9Chemical Safety and Risk ManagementOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesSafe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs

Evaluation of nine positive pressure suits for use in the biosafety level-4 laboratory

Kasloff, Samantha Beth, Marszal, Peter, Weingartl, Hana M.·2018·Applied Biosafety

Abstract

Positive pressure suits are the most recognizable feature of Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) laboratories, protecting users both through delivery of umbilical-fed HEPA-filtered air and by providing a positively pressurized microenvironment with respect to the surrounding laboratory space to minimize the possibility of exposure resulting from compromised suit integrity. While many positive pressure suits utilized in the chemical and radiation protection industries could be considered for BSL-4 use, the substantial costs and potential incompatibilities with facility settings prevent many labs from investigating novel alternatives. In the present study, 9 positive pressure suits from 5 different manufacturers were critically assessed for their suitability in the BSL-4 laboratory. Material resistance and compatibility with 5% Micro-Chem Plus™, CO2 exposure levels, and overall user preference were assessed through a combination of objective and subjective testing. Results demonstrated that exposure to 5% Micro-Chem Plus™ had no deleterious effects on the mechanical properties of most suit materials, though some potential incompatibility was observed with butyl fabrics. Real-time monitoring of CO2 levels inside the suits showed a great deal of variation between models, however all suits provided a microenvironment where users were exposed to CO2 levels below 1% during normal activity and less than 2% during periods of disconnect from supply air. Finally, survey results from study participants indicated a strong preference for suits with light construction material, 360-degree visibility, high delivery airflow and gloves that require fixation by taping. By combining the present results with facility-specific factors, laboratories will be better equipped to consider new models that best suit their needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1535676018793151

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kasloff, S. B., Marszal, P., & Weingartl, H. M.
Affiliations
Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Kasloff, Samantha Beth
  • Weingartl, Hana M.
Venue
Applied Biosafety
Published
2018-08-21
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
223-232
ISSN
  • 1091-3505 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-6760
  • 2470-1246
OpenAlex
W2888684584
Cited by
9
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Biosafety (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Science and Security Program (Biosafety Level 4 Zoonotic Disease Laboratory Netw)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Chemical Health and Safety › Chemical Safety and Risk Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
Keywords
biosafety level 4 laboratories, personal protective equipment, CO2 exposure, user preferences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review