The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomization Inference with Stata: A Guide and Software
Open accessAbstract
Randomization inference or permutation tests are only sporadically used in economics and other social sciences—this despite a steep increase in randomization in field and laboratory experiments that provide perfect experimental setups for applying randomization inference. In the context of causal inference, such tests can handle problems often faced by applied researchers, including issues arising in the context of small samples, stratified or clustered treatment assignments, or nonstandard randomization techniques. Standard statistical software packages have either no implementation of randomization tests or very basic implementations. Whenever researchers use randomization inference, they regularly code individual program routines, risking inconsistencies and coding mistakes. In this article, I show how randomization inference can best be conducted in Stata and introduce a new command, ritest, to simplify such analyses. I illustrate this approach's usefulness by replicating the results in Fujiwara and Wantchekon (2013, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5: 241–255) and running simulations. The applications cover clustered and stratified assignments, with varying cluster sizes, pairwise randomization, and the computation of nonapproximate p-values. The applications also touch upon joint hypothesis testing with randomization inference.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009) · doi:10.1515/9781400829828 · Cited by 9,467
Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4j72 · Cited by 5,051
A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference
Colin Cameron, A., & Miller, D. L. (2015) · Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.3368/jhr.50.2.317 · Cited by 5,037
Fisher, R. A. (1936) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.3923.554-a · Cited by 4,980
Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction
Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139025751 · Cited by 4,210
Design of Observational Studies
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2010) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1213-8 · Cited by 1,150
Exact and Approximate Stepdown Methods for Multiple Hypothesis Testing
Romano, J. P., & Wolf, M. (2005) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214504000000539 · Cited by 609
Cited by
Does Diversity Matter for Health? Experimental Evidence from Oakland
Alsan, M., Garrick, O., & Graziani, G. (2019) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20181446 · Cited by 676
Does Diversity Matter for Health? Experimental Evidence from Oakland
Alsan, M., Garrick, O., & Graziani, G. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w24787 · Cited by 160
Worries of the poor: The impact of financial burden on the risk attitudes of micro-entrepreneurs
Dalton, P. S., Nhung, N., & Rüschenpöhler, J. (2020) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2019.102198 · Cited by 84
Dong, M., & Oberson, R. (2022) · Accounting and Business Research · doi:10.1080/00014788.2021.1952060 · Cited by 54
Nix, J., Pickett, J. T., & Mitchell, R. J. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-019-09363-4 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Heß, S.
- Venue
- The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 630-651
- ISSN
- 1536-867X (ISSN-L)
- 1536-8734
- OpenAlex
- W2768098152
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 13.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomization Inference with Stata: A Guide and Software. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1536867x1701700306
- The paper
- Heß, S. (2017). Randomization Inference with Stata: A Guide and Software. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1701700306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.