Cited by 21Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityBehavioral and Psychological StudiesDisability Education and Employment

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Maturing of Facilitated Communication: A Means Toward Independent Communication

Open access
Cardinal, Donald N., Falvey, Mary A.·2014·Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

Abstract

Facilitated communication (FC) can be a successful means for people to learn to communicate effectively and independently. The preponderance of peer-reviewed articles supports FC as a useful tool for developing communication skills. While there has been a chasm of difference in qualitative versus quantitative studies on FC, researchers have produced a body of current literature confirming the method. Many people with significant intellectual disabilities, through the use of FC, have been able to demonstrate their ability to successfully communicate. We, as a profession, now need to respond with collaborative scholarship. In addition, revised position statements must be developed reflecting the past research findings and encouraging future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1540796914555581

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bedingfield S., 2004, Autism is a world
  2. Cardinal D., 1996, Mental Retardation, 34, 231
  3. Cardinal D., 2012, Autism: Sensory-movement differences and diversity, 135
  4. Goddard P., 2012, I am intelligent: From heartbreak to healing: A mother and daughter journey through autism
  5. Sheehan C., 1996, Mental Retardation, 34, 94
  6. Weiss M. J. S., 1996, Mental Retardation, 34, 220
  7. Wheeler D. L., 1993, Mental Retardation, 31, 49

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Cardinal, D. N., & Falvey, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Chapman University (US)
  • California State University Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities
Published
2014-09
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
189-194
ISSN
  • 0147-4375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7969
  • 2169-2408
OpenAlex
W2138325122
Cited by
21
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
Keywords
facilitated communication, intellectual disability, augmentative and alternative communication, communication skills development, evidence synthesis, position statement, collaborative scholarship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review