Cited by 2Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityDisability Education and EmploymentDisability Rights and Representation

“Hoping for Greatness”: Exploring the Notion of “Novicity” in Communication Support Partnerships

Woodfield, Casey, Jung, Eunyoung, Ashby, Christine·2014·Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

Abstract

This research explores the stage of novicity in communicative partnerships between new facilitators and the individuals with disabilities who use supported typing as their primary method of communication with whom they work. We interviewed novice and experienced facilitators, and typers who have recently worked with new facilitators to examine not only the series of processes through which novice facilitators experience and learn to support typing but also typers’ responses to those experiences. We draw connections to sign language interpreters and paraprofessionals to highlight the complexity of providing communication access and support. Two key tracks of talk emerged—one centered on skills and the other on relationships—which we lay out in a discussion of typers’ and facilitators’ perspectives on expectations, training, trust, and agency. Our results suggest the critical nature of establishing individualized expectations for and by both typers and facilitators, as well as the importance of working through the distinctive experiences brought forth in this period of novicity, as fundamental elements of developing communication partnerships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1540796914566710

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woodfield, C., Jung, E., & Ashby, C.
Affiliations
Syracuse University (US)
Venue
Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities
Published
2014-12
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
274-289
ISSN
  • 0147-4375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7969
  • 2169-2408
OpenAlex
W2325970865
Cited by
2
References
39
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
augmentative and alternative communication, communication partners, people with disabilities, trust, agency, expectations, sign language interpreters, paraprofessionals, communication access

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review