Cited by 6Technology Use by Older AdultsUsability and User Interface DesignInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

Comparing Older and Younger Adults' Traversal Time in Expandable and Non-Expandable Hierarchical Structures

Open access
Kurniawan, Hastuti, Ellis, R. Darin, Zaphiris, Panayiotis·2002·Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting

Abstract

The present study investigates time and click error differences when older and younger computer users traversed expandable and non-expandable online hierarchical information structures to reach a target. The results show that older users were slower but did not make more errors than their younger counterparts, suggesting more cautious decision making. The study did not show superiority of either hierarchy in terms of traversal time but the expandable hierarchy resulted in fewer errors to get to the target. Although older users significantly rated their computer and Internet experience lower than younger participants, experience did not alter the significance of age and hierarchy differences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/154193120204600203

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Visual interfaces for older users can accommodate a large number of options if the options are easy to scan, recognise, and digest.

    “Visual interfaces for older users in particular can accommodate a large number of options if the options are easy to scan, recognise, and digest (Kurniawan et al., 2002; Zaphiris et al., 2007).”

    From Reducing working memory load in spoken dialogue systems (2009) · cites this paper as Kurniawan et al., 2002

    The Stimulus and Apparatus section describes spacing categories and arranging them in columns, but does not assess how many options older users can accommodate. The Discussion and Conclusions compare navigation through two hierarchies; they do not establish the claimed condition that numerous options are acceptable when easy to scan, recognise, and digest. Searched for option count, menu breadth, and scanning or processing of options; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. In M. E. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction, second edition, Elsevier, pp. 797-812.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurniawan, H., Ellis, R. D., & Zaphiris, P.
Affiliations
  • Department of Computation UMIST Manchester, U.K.
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • City, University of London (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2002-09
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
185-188
ISSN
  • 0163-5182 (ISSN-L)
  • 1071-1813
  • 2169-5067
OpenAlex
W1996628752
Cited by
6
References
15
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (publishedVersion)
  • Ktisis at Cyprus University of Technology (Cyprus University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
age differences, older adults, traversal time, decision-making, computer experience, online experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review