The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
U pdate on B urning M outh S yndrome: O verview and P atient M anagement
Abstract
Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS) is a chronic pain syndrome that mainly affects middle-aged/old women with hormonal changes or psychological disorders. This condition is probably of multifactorial origin, often idiopathic, and its etiopathogenesis remains largely enigmatic. The present paper discusses several aspects of BMS, updates current knowledge, and provides guidelines for patient management. There is no consensus on the diagnosis and classification of BMS. The etiopathogenesis seems to be complex and in a large number of patients probably involves interactions among local, systemic, and/or psychogenic factors. In the remaining cases, new interesting associations have recently emerged between BMS and either peripheral nerve damage or dopaminergic system disorders, emphasizing the neuropathic background in BMS. Based on these recent data, we have introduced the concepts of “primary” (idiopathic) and “secondary” (resulting from identified precipitating factors) BMS, since this allows for a more systematic approach to patient management. The latter starts with a differential diagnosis based on the exclusion of both other orofacial chronic pain conditions and painful oral diseases exhibiting muco-sal lesions. However, the occurrence of overlapping/overwhelming oral mucosal pathologies, such as infections, may cause difficulties in the diagnosis ("complicated BMS"). BMS treatment is still unsatisfactory, and there is no definitive cure. As a result, a multidisciplinary approach is required to bring the condition under better control. Importantly, BMS patients should be offered regular follow-up during the symptomatic periods and psychological support for alleviating the psychogenic component of the pain. More research is necessary to confirm the association between BMS and systemic disorders, as well as to investigate possible pathogenic mechanisms involving potential nerve damage. If this goal is to be achieved, a uniform definition of BMS and strict criteria for its classification are mandatory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI)
Kerns, R. D., Turk, D. C., & Rudy, T. E. (1985) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(85)90004-1 · Cited by 2,128
Cited by
Burning mouth syndrome: An update
Lopez-Jornet, P., Camacho-Alonso, F., Andujar-Mateos, P., Sanchez-Siles, M., & Gomez-Garcia, F. (2010) · Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal · doi:10.4317/medoral.15.e562 · Cited by 294
Group psychotherapy: An additional approach to burning mouth syndrome
Miziara, I. D., Filho, B. C. A., Oliveira, R., & Rodrigues dos Santos, R. M. (2009) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.01.013 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Scala, A., Checchi, L., Montevecchi, M., Marini, I., & Giamberardino, M. A.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 275-291
- ISSN
- 1045-4411 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-1113
- OpenAlex
- W2126816876
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: U pdate on B urning M outh S yndrome: O verview and P atient M anagement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/154411130301400405
- The paper
- Scala, A., Checchi, L., Montevecchi, M., Marini, I., & Giamberardino, M. A. (2003). U pdate on B urning M outh S yndrome: O verview and P atient M anagement. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/154411130301400405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.