The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cellular Transplants in China: Observational Study from the Largest Human Experiment in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Open accessAbstract
Background. In China, fetal brain tissue has been transplanted into the lesions of more than 400 patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Anecdotal reports have been the only basis for assuming that the procedure is safe and effective. Objective. To compare available reports to the experiences and objective findings of patients who received pre-operative and postoperative assessments before and up to 1 year after receiving cellular implants. Methods. Independent observational study of 7 chronic SCI subjects undergoing surgery by Dr Hongyun Huang in Beijing. Assessments included lesion location by magnetic resonance imaging, protocol of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), change in disability, and detailed history of the perioperative course. Results. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were not clearly defined, as subjects with myelopathies graded ASIA A through D and of diverse causes were eligible. Cell injection sites did not always correlate with the level of injury and included the frontal lobes of a subject with a high cervical lesion. Complications, including meningitis, occurred in 5 subjects. Transient postoperative hypotonicity may have accounted for some physical changes. No clinically useful sensorimotor, disability, or autonomic improvements were found. Conclusions. The phenotype and the fate of the transplanted cells, described as olfactory ensheathing cells, are unknown. Perioperative morbidity and lack of functional benefit were identified as the most serious clinical shortcomings. The procedures observed did not attempt to meet international standards for either a safety or efficacy trial. In the absence of a valid clinical trials protocol, physicians should not recommend this procedure to patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A phase 1 clinical trial of nerve growth factor gene therapy for Alzheimer disease
Tuszynski, M. H., Thal, L., Pay, M., Salmon, D. P., U, H. S., Bakay, R., Patel, P., Blesch, A., Vahlsing, H. L., Ho, G., et al. (2005) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1239 · Cited by 1,050
Cited by
Therapeutic interventions after spinal cord injury
Thuret, S., Moon, L. D. F., & Gage, F. H. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1955 · Cited by 1,012
Stem Cell Clinics Online: The Direct-to-Consumer Portrayal of Stem Cell Medicine
Lau, D., Ogbogu, U., Taylor, B., Stafinski, T., Menon, D., & Caulfield, T. (2008) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.11.001 · Cited by 337
Restoring function after spinal cord injury: towards clinical translation of experimental strategies
Ramer, L. M., Ramer, M. S., & Bradbury, E. J. (2014) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70144-9 · Cited by 324
Chisholm, J., Ruff, C., & Viswanathan, S. (2019) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.03.005 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Dobkin, B. H., Curt, A., & Guest, J.
- Venue
- Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-13
- ISSN
- 0888-4390 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-9683
- 1552-6844
- OpenAlex
- W2124538252
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular Transplants in China: Observational Study from the Largest Human Experiment in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1545968305284675
- The paper
- Dobkin, B. H., Curt, A., & Guest, J. (2006). Cellular Transplants in China: Observational Study from the Largest Human Experiment in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968305284675
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.