Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Role of the Frontal Lobe in Complex Walking Among Patients With Parkinson’s Disease and Healthy Older Adults: An fNIRS Study

Open access
Maidan, Inbal, Nieuwhof, Freek, Bernad-Elazari, Hagar, Reelick, Miriam F., Bloem, Bas R., Giladi, Nir, Deutsch, Judith E., Hausdorff, Jeffery M., Claassen, Jurgen A. H., Mirelman, Anat·2016·Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Abstract

Background. Gait is influenced by higher order cognitive and cortical control mechanisms. Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has been used to examine frontal activation during walking in healthy older adults, reporting increased oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) levels during dual task walking (DT), compared with usual walking. Objective. To investigate the role of the frontal lobe during DT and obstacle negotiation, in healthy older adults and patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods. Thirty-eight healthy older adults (mean age 70.4 ± 0.9 years) and 68 patients with PD (mean age 71.7 ± 1.1 years,) performed 3 walking tasks: ( a) usual walking, ( b) DT walking, and ( c) obstacles negotiation, with fNIRS and accelerometers. Linear-mix models were used to detect changes between groups and within tasks. Results. Patients with PD had higher activation during usual walking ( P < .030). During DT, HbO2 increased only in healthy older adults ( P < .001). During obstacle negotiation, HbO2 increased in patients with PD ( P = .001) and tended to increase in healthy older adults ( P = .053). Higher DT and obstacle cost ( P < .003) and worse cognitive performance were observed in patients with PD ( P = .001). Conclusions. A different pattern of frontal activation during walking was observed between groups. The higher activation during usual walking in patients with PD suggests that the prefrontal cortex plays an important role already during simple walking. However, higher activation relative to baseline during obstacle negotiation and not during DT in the patients with PD demonstrates that prefrontal activation depends on the nature of the task. These findings may have important implications for rehabilitation of gait in patients with PD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1545968316650426

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Maidan, I., Nieuwhof, F., Bernad-Elazari, H., Reelick, M. F., Bloem, B. R., Giladi, N., Deutsch, J. E., Hausdorff, J. M., Claassen, J. A. H., & Mirelman, A.
Venue
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Published
2016-07-10
Volume
30
Issue
10
Pages
963-971
ISSN
  • 0888-4390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9683
  • 1552-6844
OpenAlex
W2407736941
Cited by
302
References
5
FWCI
53.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of the Frontal Lobe in Complex Walking Among Patients With Parkinson’s Disease and Healthy Older Adults: An fNIRS Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1545968316650426
The paper
Maidan, I., Nieuwhof, F., Bernad-Elazari, H., Reelick, M. F., Bloem, B. R., Giladi, N., Deutsch, J. E., Hausdorff, J. M., Claassen, J. A. H., & Mirelman, A. (2016). The Role of the Frontal Lobe in Complex Walking Among Patients With Parkinson’s Disease and Healthy Older Adults: An fNIRS Study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968316650426

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.