Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Collections Care Informed by Native American Perspectives: Teaching the Next Generation

Shannon, Jennifer·2017·Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals

Abstract

Through repatriation consultations, collaborative exhibitions, and research projects with Native peoples, anthropology curators and collections managers are learning different interpretations of best practice in the care of Native American collections. In this case study of the Museum and Field Studies (MFS) program at the University of Colorado, Boulder, we review the practice and potential of bringing those perspectives to bear on the next generation of anthropology collections managers. Through examples of traditional care, exhibits, course work, and student projects, we show how Native peoples are influencing how we think about and care for museum collections. We illustrate future collections managers’ increasing sense of purpose and excitement toward working with Native peoples and reimagining the museum to be a resource for increasing Native community well-being and a welcoming place for alternative ways of seeing and relating to the collections in their care.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/155019061701303-402

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Berlo Janet, 1998, Native North American Art.
  2. Clavir Miriam, 2002, Preserving What Is Valued: Museums, Conservation, and First Nations.
  3. 10.7208/chicago/9780226299044.001.0001 · DOI
  4. Colwell Chip, 2010, Crossroads of Culture: Anthropology Collections at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science.
  5. 10.1525/eth.1990.18.1.02a00010 · DOI
  6. Fine-Dare Kathy, 2002, Grave Injustice: The American Indian Repatriation Movement and NAGPRA.
  7. 10.1525/mua.2001.25.1.31 · DOI
  8. Harper Kenn, 2001, Give Me My Father's Body: The Life of Minik, the New York Eskimo.
  9. Hollinger R. Eric, 2013, Museum Anthropology Review, 7, 201
  10. Janes Robert R., 2015, We Are Coming Home: Repatriation and the Restoration of Blackfoot Cultural Confidence, 241
  11. Kramer Kayla, 2013, “Object Biographies: A Mandan-Hidatsa-Arikara Nation Man's Buckskin and Quillwork Outfit, a Nez Perce Woman's Buckskin Dress, a Ramos Polychrome Jar, and a Navajo Man's Military Style-Jacket.”
  12. 10.1111/muan.12087 · DOI
  13. Krmpotich Cara, 2014, This Is Our Life: Haida Material Heritage and Changing Museum Practice.
  14. McKeown C. Timothy, 2013, In the Smaller Scope of Conscience: The Struggle for National Repatriation Legislation, 1986–1990.
  15. Ogden Sherelyn, 2004, Caring for American Indian Objects: A Practical and Cultural Guide.
  16. Pearlstein Ellen, 2016, Studies in Conservation.
  17. Phillips Ruth, 2011, Museum Pieces: Toward the Indigenization of Canadian Museums., 10.1515/9780773587465 · DOI
  18. 10.1525/mua.1998.22.1.33 · DOI
  19. Shannon Jennifer, 2014, Our Lives: Collaboration, Native Voice, and the Making of the National Museum of the American Indian.
  20. Shannon Jennifer, 2014, Museum as Process: Translating Local and Global Knowledges, 67
  21. Simpson Moira, 2001, Making Representations: Museums in the Post-Colonial Era.
  22. Smith Linda Tuhiwai, 1999, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples.
  23. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143749 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shannon, J.
Affiliations
Cultural Anthropology, University of Colorado Museum of Natural History, Boulder, CO;
Venue
Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals
Published
2017-09
Volume
13
Issue
3-4
Pages
205-223
ISSN
1550-1906
Cited by
13
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review