The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Collections Care Informed by Native American Perspectives: Teaching the Next Generation
Abstract
Through repatriation consultations, collaborative exhibitions, and research projects with Native peoples, anthropology curators and collections managers are learning different interpretations of best practice in the care of Native American collections. In this case study of the Museum and Field Studies (MFS) program at the University of Colorado, Boulder, we review the practice and potential of bringing those perspectives to bear on the next generation of anthropology collections managers. Through examples of traditional care, exhibits, course work, and student projects, we show how Native peoples are influencing how we think about and care for museum collections. We illustrate future collections managers’ increasing sense of purpose and excitement toward working with Native peoples and reimagining the museum to be a resource for increasing Native community well-being and a welcoming place for alternative ways of seeing and relating to the collections in their care.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Collections visits with Tribal partners can quickly turn the notion of who the experts in the room are on its head.
“As others have described (Shannon 2017), collections visits with Tribal partners can quickly turn the notion of who the “experts” in the room are on its head.”
From Perspectives, Policies, and Practices: Challenges and Pathways for Culturally Sensitive Collections Care (2025) · cites this paper as Shannon 2017
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Berlo Janet, 1998, Native North American Art.
- Clavir Miriam, 2002, Preserving What Is Valued: Museums, Conservation, and First Nations.
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226299044.001.0001 · DOI
- Colwell Chip, 2010, Crossroads of Culture: Anthropology Collections at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science.
- 10.1525/eth.1990.18.1.02a00010 · DOI
- Fine-Dare Kathy, 2002, Grave Injustice: The American Indian Repatriation Movement and NAGPRA.
- 10.1525/mua.2001.25.1.31 · DOI
- Harper Kenn, 2001, Give Me My Father's Body: The Life of Minik, the New York Eskimo.
- Hollinger R. Eric, 2013, Museum Anthropology Review, 7, 201
- Janes Robert R., 2015, We Are Coming Home: Repatriation and the Restoration of Blackfoot Cultural Confidence, 241
- Kramer Kayla, 2013, “Object Biographies: A Mandan-Hidatsa-Arikara Nation Man's Buckskin and Quillwork Outfit, a Nez Perce Woman's Buckskin Dress, a Ramos Polychrome Jar, and a Navajo Man's Military Style-Jacket.”
- 10.1111/muan.12087 · DOI
- Krmpotich Cara, 2014, This Is Our Life: Haida Material Heritage and Changing Museum Practice.
- McKeown C. Timothy, 2013, In the Smaller Scope of Conscience: The Struggle for National Repatriation Legislation, 1986–1990.
- Ogden Sherelyn, 2004, Caring for American Indian Objects: A Practical and Cultural Guide.
- Pearlstein Ellen, 2016, Studies in Conservation.
- Phillips Ruth, 2011, Museum Pieces: Toward the Indigenization of Canadian Museums., 10.1515/9780773587465 · DOI
- 10.1525/mua.1998.22.1.33 · DOI
- Shannon Jennifer, 2014, Our Lives: Collaboration, Native Voice, and the Making of the National Museum of the American Indian.
- Shannon Jennifer, 2014, Museum as Process: Translating Local and Global Knowledges, 67
- Simpson Moira, 2001, Making Representations: Museums in the Post-Colonial Era.
- Smith Linda Tuhiwai, 1999, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples.
- 10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143749 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pathways to Repatriation for NAGPRA Practitioners: Introduction
Yann, J., Domeischel, J., Roberts Thompson, A., & Schreiner, N. M. (2025) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2025.10107 · Cited by 2
Bowers, K. J., & Elmore, J. R. (2025) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2025.10098 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Shannon, J.
- Affiliations
- Cultural Anthropology, University of Colorado Museum of Natural History, Boulder, CO;
- Venue
- Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 205-223
- ISSN
- 1550-1906
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review