Indigenous research ethics requirements: an examination of six tribal institutional review board applications and processes in the United States
Abstract
Tribal Institutional Review Boards (TIRBs) in the United States assert their rights within sovereign nations by developing ethical research processes that align with tribal values to protect indigenous knowledge systems and their community from cultural appropriation, exploitation, misuse, and harm. We reviewed six TIRB applications and processes to gain a better understanding about their requirements and research ethics. We located 48 activated and deactivated TIRBs in a database, mapped them in relation to tribal reservation lands, and then conducted in-depth content analysis. Our analysis demonstrates the importance of building relationships, becoming fully acquainted with the TIRB’s operating environment before seeking research approval, and issues related to tribal data management practices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Indigenous Peoples in the US have established various review mechanisms to approve research in their communities and with their citizens.
“Indigenous Peoples in the US have established various review mechanisms to approve research in their communities and with their citizens (Around Him et al., 2019; Kuhn et al., 2020).”
From Indigenous Peoples and research: self-determination in research governance (2023) · cites this paper as Kuhn et al., 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indigenous Peoples and research: self-determination in research governance
Garba, I., Sterling, R., Plevel, R., Carson, W., Cordova-Marks, F. M., Cummins, J., Curley, C., David-Chavez, D., Fernandez, A., Hiraldo, D., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2023.1272318 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kuhn, N. S., Parker, M., & Lefthand-Begay, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lefthand-Begay, Clarita
- Venue
- Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-04-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 279-291
- ISSN
- 1556-2646 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-2654
- OpenAlex
- W3014261508
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ronald E. McNair Fellowship provided by the Graduate Opportunities and Minority Achievement Program of the University of Washington (N/A)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Keywords
- Indigenous research ethics, tribal sovereignty, indigenous knowledge, cultural appropriation, research approval process
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Indians, North American, United States, Ethics Committees, Research, Ethics, Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review