Cited by 151Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesPolicing Practices and PerceptionsIntimate Partner and Family Violence

True colors: Police officers and rape myth acceptance

Open access
Dellinger Page, Amy·2010·Feminist Criminology

Abstract

Institutionally, significant advancements in rape law reform have occurred. Culturally, police officers sometimes fail to adopt these changes. A survey designed to assess acceptance of rape myths was administered to 891 police officers in two southeastern states. The study found that the majority of police officers view the overall crime of rape as a serious one, however, approximately 6% provided sexist feedback that supports rape myths. These findings indicate that more work is needed in altering the attitudes of police officers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1557085110384108

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Police officers generally endorsed some rape myths whilst discounting others.

    “Police officers generally endorsed some rape myths whilst discounting others and deemed victims with certain characteristics (e.g.virgin, a professional woman) more credible than others (e.g. a man, a prostitute).”
  • Police officers deemed victims with certain characteristics (e.g., virgin, a professional woman) more credible than others (e.g., a man, a prostitute).

    “Police officers generally endorsed some rape myths whilst discounting others and deemed victims with certain characteristics (e.g.virgin, a professional woman) more credible than others (e.g. a man, a prostitute).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 151

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
  2. McNamara, R. P. (1999). The socialization of the police. In D. J. Kenney & R. P. McNamara (Eds.), Police and policing: Contemporary issues (2nd ed., pp. 309-323). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  3. Walker, S. (1998). Sense and nonsense about crime and drugs: A police guide (4th ed.).

Authors
Dellinger Page, A.
Affiliations
Appalachian State University, Boone, NC,
Venue
Feminist Criminology
Published
2010-10
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
315-334
ISSN
  • 1557-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-086X
OpenAlex
W2128687389
Cited by
151
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Feminist Criminology (publishedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
rape myths, police attitudes, rape law reform, sexism, gender attitudes, law enforcement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review