CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 416Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesGender, Feminism, and Media

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revenge Porn and Mental Health: A Qualitative Analysis of the Mental Health Effects of Revenge Porn on Female Survivors

Bates, Samantha·2017·Feminist Criminology
DOI 10.1177/1557085116654565
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examines the emotional and mental health effects revenge porn has on female survivors. To date, no other academic studies have exclusively focused on mental health effects in revenge porn cases. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted between February 2014 and January 2015 with 18 female revenge porn survivors, and inductive analysis revealed participants’ experiences of trust issues, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, suicidal thoughts, and several other mental health effects. These findings reveal the seriousness of revenge porn, the devastating impacts it has on survivors’ mental health, and similarities between revenge porn and sexual assault.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1557085116654565

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 40 references

2 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bloom S., 2014, Fordham Urban Law Journal, 42, 233
  2. Cecil A. L., 2014, Washington and Lee Law Review, 71, 2513
  3. Citron D. K., 2014, Wake Forest Law Review, 49, 345
  4. Franks M. A., 2011, Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 20, 224
  5. Hall R., 2004, Hypatia, 19, 1
  6. Laird L., 2013, ABA Journal, 99, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–416 of 416

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bates, S.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Bates, Samantha
Venue
Feminist Criminology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2016-07-24
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
22-42
ISSN
  • 1557-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-086X
DOI
10.1177/1557085116654565
OpenAlex
W2474134308
Cited by
414
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
56.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Feminist Criminology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
revenge porn, mental health, women survivors, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, trust issues, sexual assault, intimate partner violence, online sexual harassment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review