Cited by 3Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisParticipatory Visual Research MethodsIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

“We All Have Power”: Using Photovoice to Document Challenges and Strengths of Lakota Women With Histories of Incarceration

Edwards, Katie M., Camp, Emily E., Luethke, Tiffani N., Herrington, Ramona, Roach, LaVonne, Bertsche, Maggie, Trujillo, Preciouse, Carter-Bolick, India Rose +2 more·2024·Feminist Criminology

Abstract

Results from a photovoice study with 13 Lakota women found that there were numerous barriers (e.g., finding stable housing, finding a job) to reintegration following incarceration and that trauma, grief, and loss were identified as prominent challenges throughout attempts at reintegration. Despite tremendous aversities, Lakota women identified their ability to connect with people, nature, and culture as key sources of their strength and resilience. This research highlights the urgent need for comprehensive, culturally grounded, strengths-focused initiatives as well as structural policy change that will support Lakota and other Indigenous women’s reintegration into their communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/15570851231220102

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. American Indian Prison Project Workgroup, 2022, American Indian prison project working group
  2. Baldry E., 2009, Indigenous Law Bulletin, 7, 14
  3. Berman J., 2005, Women offender transition and reentry: Gender responsive approaches to transitioning women offenders from prison to the community
  4. Carson A. E., 2018, Prisoners in 2016
  5. Corcoran C., 2017, The juxtaposition of “Gentle Action” theory and Native American ways of knowing and being: The provision of services to Native American women experiencing incarceration
  6. Diamond-Welch B. K., 2021, The South Dakota network against family violence & sexual assault’s efforts to address sexual assault prevention & response
  7. Eid T., 2015, A roadmap for making native America safer: Report to the president and congress of the United States (presentation)
  8. Monazzam N., 2022, Incarcerated women and girls
  9. Office of Human Services Policy, 2021, Improving outcomes for American Indian/Alaska native people returning to the community from incarceration: A resource guide for service providers
  10. Vera Institute of Justice, 2019, Incarceration trends in South Dakota
  11. Wang L., 2021, The US criminal justice system disproportionately hurts Native people: The data, visualized

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Edwards, K. M., Camp, E. E., Luethke, T. N., Herrington, R., Roach, L., Bertsche, M., Trujillo, P., Carter-Bolick, I. R., Mullet, N., & Than, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • University of Nebraska at Kearney (US)
  • North Dakota State University (US)
Corresponding author
Edwards, Katie M.
Venue
Feminist Criminology
Published
2023-12-13
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
191-219
ISSN
  • 1557-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-086X
OpenAlex
W4389658759
Cited by
3
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Feminist Criminology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Nebraska Tobacco Settlement Biomedical Research Development Funds
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
Lakota women, incarceration, reintegration, indigenous women, trauma, grief and loss, resilience, strengths-based approach, culturally grounded interventions, housing instability, barriers to employment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review