Counter and Complicit Masculine Discourse Among Men’s Shed Members
Open accessAbstract
Men’s Sheds is a growing international movement aimed at providing men with places and activities that facilitate social connectedness. Despite Men’s Sheds’ focus on males, little attention has been paid to masculinities within the specific context of these settings. The current study used a gender relations framework to explore the ways in which attendees discussed Men’s Sheds, with particular attention to discussions that were complicit and counter to traditional, hegemonic views of masculinity, and diverse positions in between these binaries. The data consisted of transcripts and field notes from four focus groups comprising mostly older, White, retired male members of a Canadian shed ( N = 22). The analysis revealed three overall themes: (1) focus on work, (2) independence, and (3) need for male-focused spaces. These themes and associated subthemes suggest that shed members ascribe to dominant masculine values and ideals, but also support more fluid and flexible views of masculinity. Implications are discussed for how working with an array of masculinities within the Men’s Sheds movement will be helpful with respect to their future growth in Canada and internationally.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In regions such as Cornwall, male-voice choirs acted as gatekeepers for local, White, working-class cultures during a period when ethnic diversity was otherwise increasing, in the same way they may have been complicit in fostering hegemonic masculinity.
“In the same way in which male-voice choirs may have been complicit in fostering hegemonic masculinity (cf.Connell & Messerschmidt 2005;Mackenzie et al. 2017), in regions such as Cornwall they also acted as gatekeepers for local, White, working-class cultures during a period when ethnic diversity was otherwise increasing.”
From ‘I don’t care who joins my choir’: Investigating attitudes to diversity and inclusivity in lower- and upper-voice choirs in the United Kingdom (2025) · cites this paper as Mackenzie et al. 2017
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExclusionary attitudes towards gender and sexual minorities among LV choirs may stem from entrenched social codes, which may relate to older men's reluctance to disclose their gender or sexual identity because of historic stigmatisation and the perceived benefits of male-focused spaces.
“It is possible that exclusionary attitudes towards gender and sexual minorities may stem from these entrenched codes within LV choirs, that may in turn relate to the reluctance among older men to disclose their gender or sexual identity because of historic stigmatisation (Simpson et al. 2018), and the perceived benefits of male-focussed spaces (Milligan et al. 2016;Mackenzie et al. 2017;Nurmi et a”
From ‘I don’t care who joins my choir’: Investigating attitudes to diversity and inclusivity in lower- and upper-voice choirs in the United Kingdom (2025) · cites this paper as Mackenzie et al. 2017
Men in male-focused recreational activities may experience improved wellbeing but may also remain complicit in hegemonic ideologies of masculinity because of their perceived freedom from being 'policed' by women.
“Past research into malefocussed recreational activity has suggested that although men may experience improved wellbeing as a result of engagement in gendered interventions (Milligan et al. 2016), they may also remain complicit in hegemonic ideologies of masculinity because of their perceived freedom from being 'policed' by women (Mackenzie et al. 2017).”
From ‘I don’t care who joins my choir’: Investigating attitudes to diversity and inclusivity in lower- and upper-voice choirs in the United Kingdom (2025) · cites this paper as Mackenzie et al. 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243205278639 · Cited by 9,367 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Anderson E. (2009). Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Ballinger M. Talbot L. Verrinder G. (2009). More than a place to do woodwork: A case study of a community-based Men’s Shed. Journal of Men’s Health, 6, 20- 27.
- Bennett K. M. (2007). “No sissy stuff”: Towards a theory of masculinity and emotional expression in older widowed men. Journal of Ageing Studies, 21, 347- 356.
- Brown A. (2008). Health after the workplace: Is retirement a health hazard for men? Journal of Men’s Health, 5, 108- 109.
- Coles T. Vassarotti T. (2012). Ageing and identity dilemmas for men. Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging, 24, 30- 41.
- Collinson D. L. Hearn J. (2004). Men and masculinities in work, organizations and management. In Kimmel M. Hearn J. Connell R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 289- 310). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Connell R. W. (1995) Masculinities. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
- Cordier R. Wilson N. J. (2014). Mentoring at Men’s Sheds: An international survey about a community approach to health and well-being. Health & Social Care in the Community, 22, 249- 258. 24199944
- Creighton G. Oliffe J. L. (2010). Theorising masculinities and men’s health: A brief history with a view to practice. Health Sociology Review, 19, 409- 418.
- Donaldson M. (1993). What Is Hegemonic Masculinity? Theory and Society, 22(5), 643- 657.
- Golding B. (2011). Older men’s wellbeing through community participation in Australia. International Journal of Men’s Health, 10(1), 26- 44.
- Hansji N. L. Wilson N. J. Cordier R. (2015). Men’s Sheds: Enabling environments for Australian men living with and without long-term disabilities. Health & Social Care in the Community, 23, 272- 281. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12140 25428844 · DOI
- Hearn J. (1994). Research in men and masculinities: Some sociological issues and possibilities. Journal of Sociology, 30(1), 47- 70.
- Kaplan D. Rosenmann A. Shuhendler S. (2016). What about nontraditional masculinities? Toward a quantitative model of therapeutic new masculinity ideology. Men and Masculinities. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1097184X16634797 · DOI
- Levant R. F. Hirsch L. Celentano E. Cozza T. Hill S. MacEachern M. Schnedeker J. (1992). The male role: An investigation of norms and stereotypes. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 14, 325- 337.
- Milligan C. Dowrick C. Payne S. Hanratty B. Irwin P. Neary D. Richardson D. (2013). Men’s Sheds and other gendered interventions for older men: Improving health and wellbeing through social activity: A systematic review and scoping of the evidence base. Lancaster, England: Lancaster University Centre for Ageing Research.
- Milligan C. Neary D. Payne S. Hanratty B. Irwin P. Dowrick C. (2015). Older men and social activity: A scoping review of Men’s Sheds and other gendered interventions. Ageing & Society, 36, 895- 923.
- Oliffe J. L. Ogrodniczuk J. Bottorff J. L. Hislop T. G. Halpin M. (2009). Connecting humor, health and masculinities at prostate cancer support groups. Psycho-Oncology, 18, 916- 926. 19137527
- Oliffe J. L. Rasmussen B. Bottorff J. L. Kelly M. T. Galdas P. M. Phinney A. Ogrodniczuk J. S. (2013). Masculinities, work, and retirement among older men who experience depression. Qualitative Health Research, 23, 1626- 1637. 24177678
- O’Neil J. M. Helms B. J. Gable R. K. David L. Wrightsman L. S. (1986). Gender Role Conflict Scale: College men’s fear of femininity. Sex Roles, 14, 335. doi: 10.1007/BF00287583 · DOI
- Phillips D. A. (2006). Masculinity, male development, gender, and identity: Modern and postmodern meanings. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 27, 403- 423. 16546938
- Richardson N. Smith J. A. (2011). National men’s health policies in Ireland and Australia: What are the challenges associated with transitioning from development to implementation? Public Health, 125, 424- 432. 21726883
- Ritchie J. Lewis J. Nicholls C. M. Ormston R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London, England: Sage.
- Robertson S. (2007). Understanding men and health: Masculinities, identity and well-being. London, England: McGraw-Hill Education.
- Robertson S. Williams B. Oliffe J. (2016). The case for retaining a focus on “masculinities” in men’s health research. International Journal of Men’s Health, 15(1), 52- 67.
- Saxton B. Cole T. R. (2012). No country for old men: A search for masculinity in later life. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 7, 97- 116.
- Southcombe A. Cavanagh J. Bartram T. (2015). Capacity building in indigenous men’s groups and sheds across Australia. Health Promotion International, 30, 606- 615. 24399032
- Tannenbaum C. Frank B. (2011). Masculinity and health in late life men. American Journal of Men’s Health, 5, 243- 254. 20937737
- van den Hoonaard D. K (2007). Aging and masculinity: A topic whose time has come. Journal of Aging Studies, 21, 277- 280.
- Wilson N. J. Cordier R. (2013). A narrative review of Men’s Sheds literature: Reducing social isolation and promoting men’s health and well-being. Health & Social Care in the Community, 21, 451- 463. 23343146
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MacGregor, E. H., & Pitts, S. E. (2025) · International Journal of Community Music · doi:10.1386/ijcm_00119_1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mackenzie, C. S., Roger, K., Robertson, S., Oliffe, J. L., Nurmi, M. A., & Urquhart, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Leeds Beckett University (GB)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Mackenzie, Corey S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Men's Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-01-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1224-1236
- ISSN
- 1557-9883 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9891
- PMC
- PMC5675326
- OpenAlex
- W2571232272
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Men s Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Movember Canada (MH003)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
- Keywords
- men's sheds, masculinity, hegemonic masculinity, older men, work, independence, gender relations
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Canada, Demography, Humans, Male, Social Support, Focus Groups, White People, Men's Health, Masculinity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review