The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples
Abstract
WITHDRAWN: Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. DOI 10.1177/1558689806292430 Article withdrawn by publisher. Due to an administrative error, this article was accidentally published OnlineFirst and in Volume 1 Issue 1 of publishing year 2007 with different DOIs and different page numbers. The incorrect version of the article with DOI: 10.1177/2345678906292430 has been replaced with this correction notice. The correct and citable version of the article remains: Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. DOI 10.1177/1558689806292430
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · Cited by 45,787
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
(1998) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 38,631
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170
Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.)
Sharp, C. A. (2003) · Evaluation Journal of Australasia · doi:10.1177/1035719x0300300213 · Cited by 10,489
Maxwell, J. (2009) · The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods · doi:10.4135/9781483348858.n7 · Cited by 1,734
Mixed methodology combining qualitative and quantitative approaches
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. B. (1998) · Cited by 786
Self-citationCurtis, S., Gesler, W., Smith, G., & Washburn, S. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00350-0 · Cited by 591
Schools Make a Difference: Lessons Learned from a 10-Year Study of School Effects
Teddlie, C. B., & Stringfield, S. (1993) · Cited by 298
Self-citationPrevalence of Mixed-methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research
Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2006) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.2167/eri421.0 · Cited by 226
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Kemper, E., Stringfield. S. & Teddlie, C. (2003). Mixed methods sampling strategies in social science research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 273-296). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Krueger, R. A. & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Kuzel, A. J. (1992). Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 31-44). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Lasserre-Cortez, S. (2006). A mixed methods examination of professional development through whole faculty study groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
- LeCompte, M. D. & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
- Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
- Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Reynolds, D. & Teddlie, C. (2000). The processes of school effectiveness. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 134-159). London: Falmer.
- Rosenshine, B. & Stevens, R. (1986) Teaching functions. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Third handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.
- Shulha, L. & Wilson, R. (2003). Collaborative mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 639-670). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003a). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003b). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 671-702). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Ward, M. (1986). Them children: A study in language learning (Reprint ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
- Wunsch, D. R. (1986). Survey research: Determining sample size and representative response. Business Education Forum, 40(5), 31-34.
- Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cited by
Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods
Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/2345678906293042 · Cited by 1,155
Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: the case of interviews with elite informants
Aguinis, H., & Solarino, A. M. (2019) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3015 · Cited by 791
Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2007) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689807299526 · Cited by 552
Thinking together: What makes Communities of Practice work?
Pyrko, I., Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. (2017) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726716661040 · Cited by 559
Lindahl, J. R., Fisher, N. E., Cooper, D. J., Rosen, R. K., & Britton, W. B. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176239 · Cited by 476
Metadata
- Authors
- Teddlie, C., & Yu, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Mixed Methods Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-100
- ISSN
- 1558-6898 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-6901
- OpenAlex
- W4239958308
- Cited by
- 1,762
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 53.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1558689806292430
- The paper
- Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
