The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
WITHDRAWN - Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/2345678906292430 · Cited by 2,250
RetractedSAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010) · doi:10.4135/9781506335193 · Cited by 6,215
Self-citationFoundations of Multimethod Research
Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (2006) · doi:10.4135/9781412984294 · Cited by 287
Cited by
Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data
Syed, M., & Nelson, S. C. (2015) · Emerging Adulthood · doi:10.1177/2167696815587648 · Cited by 801
Ungar, M., & Liebenberg, L. (2011) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689811400607 · Cited by 740
Mixed methods research: toward new research designs in applied linguistics
Hashemi, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2013) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12049.x · Cited by 183
Joint displays for mixed methods research in psychology
McCrudden, M. T., Marchand, G., & Schutz, P. A. (2021) · Methods in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.metip.2021.100067 · Cited by 150
Weaving an interpretivist stance throughout mixed methods research
McChesney, K., & Aldridge, J. (2019) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/1743727x.2019.1590811 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Mixed Methods Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-7
- ISSN
- 1558-6898 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-6901
- OpenAlex
- W1992842034
- Cited by
- 1,155
- References
- 3
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2345678906293042
- The paper
- Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906293042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
