The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integration and Publications as Indicators of "Yield" From Mixed Methods Studies
Abstract
A mixed methods study has the potential to produce knowledge that is unavailable to a qualitative study and a quantitative study undertaken independently. Any unique insight or ``yield'' from a mixed methods study may be difficult to assess in practice. However, given that integration of data or findings from different components of a study is a core characteristic of mixed methods research, two possible indicators of yield can be used: first, the extent to which researchers exploit the potential for integration in mixed methods studies; and second, the way in which this integration is communicated in peer-reviewed journal articles. Here, the authors apply these indicators to mixed methods studies in health services research in the United Kingdom.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
WITHDRAWN - Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/2345678906292430 · Cited by 2,250
RetractedSAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010) · doi:10.4135/9781506335193 · Cited by 6,215
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737011003255 · Cited by 5,687
Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done
Bryman, A. (2006) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794106058877 · Cited by 3,354
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Murphy, Dingwall, Greatbatch, Parker, & Watson (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2160 · Cited by 1,107
The Case for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in Health Services Research
Barbour, R. S. (1999) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/135581969900400110 · Cited by 280
Cited by
Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12117 · Cited by 7,219
Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1865 · Cited by 1,740
Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies
O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c4587 · Cited by 1,584
Self-citationMixed methods research: toward new research designs in applied linguistics
Hashemi, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2013) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12049.x · Cited by 183
O’Cathain, A., Thomas, K. J., Drabble, S. J., Rudolph, A., Goode, J., & Hewison, J. (2014) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta18380 · Cited by 159
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Mixed Methods Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-163
- ISSN
- 1558-6898 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-6901
- OpenAlex
- W2114336684
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 27.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integration and Publications as Indicators of "Yield" From Mixed Methods Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1558689806299094
- The paper
- O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2007). Integration and Publications as Indicators of "Yield" From Mixed Methods Studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806299094
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
