CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 554Educational Research and MethodsBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchQualitative Research Methods and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Mixed Methods Investigation of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social and Health Science Research

Collins, Kathleen M. T., Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., Jiao, Qun G.·2007·Journal of Mixed Methods Research
DOI 10.1177/1558689807299526
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A sequential design utilizing identical samples was used to classify mixed methods studies via a two-dimensional model, wherein sampling designs were grouped according to the time orientation of each study's components and the relationship of the qualitative and quantitative samples. A quantitative analysis of 121 studies representing nine fields in the social or health sciences revealed that more studies utilized a sampling design that was concurrent (66.1%) than sequential (33.9%). Also, identical sampling designs were the most prevalent, followed by nested sampling, multilevel sampling, and parallel sampling, respectively. Qualitative analysis suggested that across a number of studies the researchers made statistical generalizations that were not sufficiently warranted—culminating in interpretive inconsistency and contributing to crises of representation, legitimation, integration, and politics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1558689807299526

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Cohen, J. (1965). Some statistical issues in psychological research . In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of clinical psychology (pp. 95-121). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  2. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Collins, K.M.T., 2006, Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4, 67
  4. Creswell, J.W., 2007, Design and conducting mixed methods research
  5. Flick, U., 1998, An introduction to qualitative research: Theory, method and applications
  6. Halpern, E.S., 1983, Auditing naturalistic inquiries: The development and application of a model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
  7. Johnson, R.B., Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
  8. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R . L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). Old Tappan, NJ: Macmillan.
  9. Mihalas, S., 2005, A call for greater use of mixed methods in school psychology research
  10. Newman, I., Ridenour, C.S., Newman, C. & DeMarco, G.M.P. (2003). A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 167-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2007). Mixed methods research in sociology and beyond . In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (Vol. VI, pp. 2978-2981). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  12. Onwuegbuzie, A.J., The Qualitative Report.
  13. Onwuegbuzie, A.J., 2006, Research in the Schools, 13, 48
  14. Onwuegbuzie, A.J., 2004, The Qualitative Report, 9, 770
  15. Onwuegbuzie, A.J., 2005, Generalization practices in qualitative research: Trends in the literature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern
  16. Onwuegbuzie, A.J. & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351-383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  17. RefWorks., 2006, RefWorks, release 2006 [Computer software]
  18. Shaver, J.P., 1980, Educational Researcher, 9, 9
  19. Tashakkori, A., 1998, Applied Social Research Methods Series, 46
  20. Tashakkori, A., 2003, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research
  21. Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003b). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 671-701). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  22. Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 554

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Baruch College (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2007-07
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
267-294
ISSN
  • 1558-6898 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-6901
DOI
10.1177/1558689807299526
OpenAlex
W2104948087
Semantic Scholar
98e6d1126a8b7e82182aa8b7c612b2adf2bf4df4
Cited by
552
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
FWCI
48.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Mixed Methods Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Keywords
nested sampling, multilevel sampling, synchronous sampling, time orientation, statistical generalization, politics of research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review